Lessons learned from mammography screening

被引:0
作者
Vomweg T.W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mammographie-Screening-Programm Mittelrhein, Radiologisches Institut Dr. von Essen, Emil-Schüller-Strasse 31–33, Koblenz
来源
Der Pneumologe | 2017年 / 14卷 / 3期
关键词
Cancer screening; Early detection of cancer; Informed consent; Overdiagnosis; Overtreatment;
D O I
10.1007/s10405-017-0104-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The quality-assured German mammography screening program has now been in operation throughout the country for 10 years. Aim: The experience gained over the years by the implementation of mammography screening has taught us important lessons to be considered for the introduction of any new screening program. Material and methods: During the course of the program it was necessary to continuously adapt binding guidelines regarding documentation and quality assurance. Additionally, new legal frameworks and information material for clients had to be developed. The impacts of these changes on the procedures, in particular the methods of communication within the mammography screening program are presented in this article. Results and discussion: Prior to the introduction of new screening programs, test methods have to come under closer scrutiny and should be assessed with respect to broader issues at an earlier stage. The frequency and invasiveness of additional and follow-up examinations, as well as an evaluation of potential overdiagnosis and associated overtreatment is of particular importance. A structured data matching between the screening program and the national registry in order to identify interval diseases and to calculate sensitivity and specificity of the screening method is obligatory. The information material accompanying the invitation to screening must clearly convey the pros and cons of a screening program for the target group in order that an informed decision can be made. © 2017, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 139
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Comparison of Digital Screening Mammography and Screen-Film Mammography in the Early Detection of Clinically Relevant Cancers: A Multicenter Study [J].
Bluekens, Adriana M. J. ;
Holland, Roland ;
Karssemeijer, Nico ;
Broeders, Mireille J. M. ;
den Heeten, Gerard J. .
RADIOLOGY, 2012, 265 (03) :707-714
[42]   SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY - WHO WILL MEET THE NEED [J].
MONSEES, BS .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 184 (01) :30-31
[43]   ANALYSIS OF CANCERS MISSED AT SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY [J].
BIRD, RE ;
WALLACE, TW ;
YANKASKAS, BC .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 184 (03) :613-617
[44]   MAMMOGRAPHY SCREENING CREDIT CARD AND COMPLIANCE [J].
SCHAPIRA, DV ;
KUMAR, NB ;
CLARK, RA ;
YAG, C .
CANCER, 1992, 70 (02) :509-512
[45]   Quantifying the Benefits and Harms of Screening Mammography [J].
Welch, H. Gilbert ;
Passow, Honor J. .
JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 174 (03) :448-453
[46]   Identifying churches for community-based mammography promotion: Lessons from the LAMP study [J].
Duan, NH ;
Fox, S ;
Derose, KP ;
Carson, S ;
Stockdale, S .
HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 2005, 32 (04) :536-548
[47]   Mammography screening is harmful and should be abandoned [J].
Gotzsche, Peter C. .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 2015, 108 (09) :341-345
[48]   Effectiveness of Organized Mammography Screening for Different Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes [J].
Ding, Lilu ;
Greuter, Marcel J. W. ;
Truyen, Inge ;
Goossens, Mathijs ;
Van der Vegt, Bert ;
De Schutter, Harlinde ;
Van Hal, Guido ;
de Bock, Geertruida H. .
CANCERS, 2022, 14 (19)
[49]   Towards more effective online information support for mammography screening decisions [J].
Martucci, Jessica ;
Schmidt, Harald .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 111 :423-428
[50]   The other side of technology: risk of overdiagnosis of breast cancer with mammography screening [J].
Puliti, Donella ;
Paci, Eugenio .
FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2009, 5 (04) :481-491