Lessons learned from mammography screening

被引:0
作者
Vomweg T.W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mammographie-Screening-Programm Mittelrhein, Radiologisches Institut Dr. von Essen, Emil-Schüller-Strasse 31–33, Koblenz
来源
Der Pneumologe | 2017年 / 14卷 / 3期
关键词
Cancer screening; Early detection of cancer; Informed consent; Overdiagnosis; Overtreatment;
D O I
10.1007/s10405-017-0104-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The quality-assured German mammography screening program has now been in operation throughout the country for 10 years. Aim: The experience gained over the years by the implementation of mammography screening has taught us important lessons to be considered for the introduction of any new screening program. Material and methods: During the course of the program it was necessary to continuously adapt binding guidelines regarding documentation and quality assurance. Additionally, new legal frameworks and information material for clients had to be developed. The impacts of these changes on the procedures, in particular the methods of communication within the mammography screening program are presented in this article. Results and discussion: Prior to the introduction of new screening programs, test methods have to come under closer scrutiny and should be assessed with respect to broader issues at an earlier stage. The frequency and invasiveness of additional and follow-up examinations, as well as an evaluation of potential overdiagnosis and associated overtreatment is of particular importance. A structured data matching between the screening program and the national registry in order to identify interval diseases and to calculate sensitivity and specificity of the screening method is obligatory. The information material accompanying the invitation to screening must clearly convey the pros and cons of a screening program for the target group in order that an informed decision can be made. © 2017, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 139
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Health services research is translational: lessons learned from VHA-funded research on cancer screening in older adults [J].
Walter, Louise C. .
TRANSLATIONAL BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2011, 1 (04) :548-550
[22]   Evaluations of Implementation at Early-Adopting Lung Cancer Screening Programs Lessons Learned [J].
Gesthalter, Yaron B. ;
Koppelman, Elisa ;
Bolton, Rendelle ;
Slatore, Christopher G. ;
Yoon, Sue H. ;
Cain, Hilary C. ;
Tanner, Nichole T. ;
Au, David H. ;
Clark, Jack A. ;
Wiener, Renda Soylemez .
CHEST, 2017, 152 (01) :70-80
[23]   Diagnostics of microcalcifications from minimally invasive biopsies in mammography screening [J].
Hungermann, D. ;
Weigel, S. ;
Korsching, E. ;
Heindel, W. ;
Boecker, W. ;
Decker, T. .
PATHOLOGE, 2009, 30 (01) :31-35
[24]   Lessons Learned From a Partnership to Evaluate a School Food Program [J].
Chatterjee, Avik ;
Daftary, Genevieve ;
Gatison, Lenward ;
Gillman, Matthew W. .
PROGRESS IN COMMUNITY HEALTH PARTNERSHIPS-RESEARCH EDUCATION AND ACTION, 2016, 10 (04) :577-584
[25]   Effort Required and Lessons Learned From Recruiting Health Plans and Rural Primary Care Practices for a Cancer Screening Outreach Study [J].
Badicke, Brittany ;
Coury, Jennifer ;
Myers, Emily ;
Petrik, Amanda F. ;
Larson, Jean Hiebert ;
Bhadra, Sombuddha ;
Coronado, Gloria D. ;
Davis, Melinda M. .
JOURNAL OF PRIMARY CARE AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2024, 15
[26]   CURRENT PRACTICE OF SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY IN THE UNITED-STATES - DATA FROM THE NATIONAL SURVEY OF MAMMOGRAPHY FACILITIES [J].
HOUN, F ;
BROWN, ML .
RADIOLOGY, 1994, 190 (01) :209-215
[27]   Screening Mammography: The Goal Is Changing [J].
Harris, Russell ;
Kinsinger, Linda .
AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2013, 87 (04) :246-247
[28]   Benefits and risks of mammography screening [J].
Junkermann, Hans .
ONKOLOGE, 2017, 23 (06) :422-428
[29]   Benefits and harms of mammography screening [J].
Hackshaw, Allan .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 344
[30]   Screening mammography for elderly women [J].
Johs-Artisensi, J ;
McGill, J .
CANCER PRACTICE, 2001, 9 (03) :128-133