Lessons learned from mammography screening

被引:0
作者
Vomweg T.W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mammographie-Screening-Programm Mittelrhein, Radiologisches Institut Dr. von Essen, Emil-Schüller-Strasse 31–33, Koblenz
来源
Der Pneumologe | 2017年 / 14卷 / 3期
关键词
Cancer screening; Early detection of cancer; Informed consent; Overdiagnosis; Overtreatment;
D O I
10.1007/s10405-017-0104-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The quality-assured German mammography screening program has now been in operation throughout the country for 10 years. Aim: The experience gained over the years by the implementation of mammography screening has taught us important lessons to be considered for the introduction of any new screening program. Material and methods: During the course of the program it was necessary to continuously adapt binding guidelines regarding documentation and quality assurance. Additionally, new legal frameworks and information material for clients had to be developed. The impacts of these changes on the procedures, in particular the methods of communication within the mammography screening program are presented in this article. Results and discussion: Prior to the introduction of new screening programs, test methods have to come under closer scrutiny and should be assessed with respect to broader issues at an earlier stage. The frequency and invasiveness of additional and follow-up examinations, as well as an evaluation of potential overdiagnosis and associated overtreatment is of particular importance. A structured data matching between the screening program and the national registry in order to identify interval diseases and to calculate sensitivity and specificity of the screening method is obligatory. The information material accompanying the invitation to screening must clearly convey the pros and cons of a screening program for the target group in order that an informed decision can be made. © 2017, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 139
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[11]   Interpreting Overdiagnosis Estimates in Population-based Mammography Screening [J].
de Gelder, Rianne ;
Heijnsdijk, Eveline A. M. ;
van Ravesteyn, Nicolien T. ;
Fracheboud, Jacques ;
Draisma, Gerrit ;
de Koning, Harry J. .
EPIDEMIOLOGIC REVIEWS, 2011, 33 (01) :111-121
[12]   Patient Preferences in Breast Cancer Screening: Lessons to be Learned from the US Preventive Services Task Force [J].
Sadigh, Gelareh ;
Kelly, Aine M. ;
Fagerlin, Angela ;
Carlos, Ruth C. .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2011, 18 (11) :1333-1336
[13]   Mammography screening [J].
Scharl A. .
Der Gynäkologe, 2014, 47 (5) :325-333
[14]   Impact of transition from analog screening mammography to digital screening mammography on screening outcome in The Netherlands: a population-based study [J].
Nederend, J. ;
Duijm, L. E. M. ;
Louwman, M. W. J. ;
Groenewoud, J. H. ;
Donkers-van Rossum, A. B. ;
Voogd, A. C. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2012, 23 (12) :3098-3103
[15]   Promoting Screening Mammography: Insight or Uptake? [J].
Keen, John D. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2010, 23 (06) :775-782
[16]   Lessons learned from the diversity of thyroid nodule practice [J].
Kakudo, Kennichi ;
Liu, Zhiyan ;
Jung, Chan Kwon ;
Lai, Chiung-Ru .
CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2023, 131 (12) :741-746
[17]   The burden of malignant melanoma - Lessons to be learned from Austria [J].
Monshi, Babak ;
Vujic, Marin ;
Kivaranovic, Danijel ;
Sesti, Alma ;
Oberaigner, Willi ;
Vujic, Igor ;
Ortiz-Urda, Susana ;
Posch, Christian ;
Feichtinger, Hans ;
Hackl, Monika ;
Rappersberger, Klemens .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 56 :45-53
[18]   Mammography Screening - as of 2013 [J].
Heywang-Koebrunner, S. ;
Bock, K. ;
Heindel, W. ;
Hecht, G. ;
Regitz-Jedermann, L. ;
Hacker, A. ;
Kaeaeb-Sanyal, V. .
GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2013, 73 (10) :1007-1016
[19]   The impact of mammography screening on breast cancer incidence [J].
Voogd, Adri C. .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2013, 2 (02) :113-116
[20]   Screening mammography: sparing the emperor's blushes [J].
Niraula, Saroj .
CANCER MEDICINE, 2016, 5 (10) :3018-3020