The association of robotic lobectomy volume and nodal upstaging in non-small cell lung cancer

被引:0
作者
Olugbenga T. Okusanya
Waseem Lutfi
Nicholas Baker
Rajeev Dhupar
Neil A. Christie
Ryan M. Levy
Deirdre Martinez-Meehan
Nalyn Siripong
James D. Luketich
Inderpal S. Sarkaria
机构
[1] University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine,Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery
[2] University of Pittsburgh,undefined
[3] Clinical Translational Science Institute,undefined
来源
Journal of Robotic Surgery | 2020年 / 14卷
关键词
Robotic surgery; Lobectomy; Non-small cell lung cancer; Lymph-node harvest; Upstaging;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Robotic lung resection for lung cancer has gained popularity over the last 10 years. As with many surgical techniques, there are improvements in outcomes associated with increased operative volume. We sought to investigate lymph-node harvest and upstaging rates for robotic lobectomies performed at hospitals with varying robotic experience. The National Cancer Data Base was queried for patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer who received lobectomy between 2010 and 2015. Hospitals were stratified into volume categories based on the number of robotic resections performed, as a proxy for robotic experience: low at  ≤ 12, low–middle 13–26, middle–high 27–52, and high volume at greater than or equal to 53. Lymph-node counts and nodal upstaging were compared among these volume categories. 8360 robotic lobectomies were performed. Mean lymph-node counts were for low, low–middle, middle–high, and high-volume robotic lobectomies were 9.8, 11.4, 12.9, and 12.6, respectively (P  < 0.001), while nodal-upstaging rates were 10.3%, 10.2%, 12.8%, and 13.4%, respectively (P < 0.001). Compared to low-volume hospitals, on multivariable analysis, high-volume robotic centers had increased nodal harvest (P < 0.001) and nodal-upstaging rates (P < 0.001). Robotic lobectomies performed at high-volume hospitals have greater lymph-node harvest and upstaging than low-volume hospitals.
引用
收藏
页码:709 / 715
页数:6
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Rajaram R(2017)Nationwide assessment of robotic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer Ann Thorac Surg 103 1092-1100
[2]  
Mohanty S(2016)Deconstructing robotic lobectomy J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 152 998-924
[3]  
Bentrem DJ(2016)Comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and robotic approaches for clinical stage i and stage ii non-small cell lung cancer using the society of thoracic surgeons database Ann Thorac Surg 102 917-1740
[4]  
Sarkaria IS(2017)Robotic-assisted, video-assisted thoracoscopic and open lobectomy: propensity-matched analysis of recent premier data Ann Thorac Surg 104 1733-1042
[5]  
Louie BE(2016)Use and outcomes of minimally invasive lobectomy for stage i non-small cell lung cancer in the national cancer data base Ann Thorac Surg 101 1037-437
[6]  
Wilson JL(2017)Long-term survival based on the surgical approach to lobectomy for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer: comparison of robotic, video-assisted thoracic surgery, and thoracotomy lobectomy Ann Surg 265 431-1069
[7]  
Kim S(2013)Short-term outcomes for robotic colorectal surgery by provider volume J Am Coll Surg 217 1063-1637
[8]  
Oh DS(2012)Hospital volume, utilization, costs and outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy J Urol 187 1632-303
[9]  
Reddy RM(2016)Risk factors for robotic gynecologic procedures requiring conversion to other surgical procedures Int J Gynaecol Obstet 135 299-908
[10]  
Gorrepati ML(2018)Robotic-assisted versus thoracoscopic lobectomy outcomes from high-volume thoracic surgeons Ann Thorac Surg 106 902-339