The Impact of MRI-based Inflow for the Hemodynamic Evaluation of Aortic Coarctation

被引:0
作者
L. Goubergrits
R. Mevert
P. Yevtushenko
J. Schaller
U. Kertzscher
S. Meier
S. Schubert
E. Riesenkampff
T. Kuehne
机构
[1] Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin,Biofluid Mechanics Laboratory
[2] Fraunhofer MEVIS,Modeling and Simulation Group
[3] Deutsches Herzzentrum,Department of Congenital Heart Disease and Paediatric Cardiology
[4] Charité-Universitätsmedizin,Non
[5] German Heart Institute,Invasive Cardiac Imaging in Congenital Heart Disease Unit
来源
Annals of Biomedical Engineering | 2013年 / 41卷
关键词
Aortic coarctation; Computational fluid dynamics; 4D MRI; Angiography;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Aortic coarctation (CoA) accounting for 3–11% of congenital heart disease can be successfully treated. Long-term results, however, have revealed decreased life expectancy associated with abnormal hemodynamics. Accordingly, an assessment of hemodynamics is the key factor in treatment decisions and successful long-term results. In this study, 3D angiography whole heart (3DWH) and 4D phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data were acquired. Geometries of the thoracic aorta with CoAs were reconstructed using ZIB-Amira software. X-ray angiograms were used to evaluate the post-treatment geometry. Computational fluid dynamics models in three patients were created to simulate pre- and post-treatment situations using the FLUENT program. The aim of the study was to investigate the impact of the inlet velocity profile (plug vs. MRI-based) with a focus on the peak systole pressure gradient and wall shear stress (WSS). Results show that helical flow at the aorta inlet can significantly affect the assessment of pressure drop and WSS. Simplified plug inlet velocity profiles significantly (p < 0.05) overestimate the pressure drop in pre- and post-treatment geometries and significantly (p < 0.05) underestimate surface-averaged WSS. We conclude that the use of the physiologically correct but time-expensive 4D MRI-based in vivo velocity profile in CFD studies may be an important step towards a patient-specific analysis of CoA hemodynamics.
引用
收藏
页码:2575 / 2587
页数:12
相关论文
共 183 条
[1]  
Arzani A(2012)In vivo validation of numerical prediction for turbulence intensity in an aortic coarctation Ann. Biomed. Eng. 40 860-870
[2]  
Dyverfeldt P(2005)From angiographies to computational flow in saccular aneurisms: the INRIA experience Med. Image Anal 9 133-143
[3]  
Ebbers T(1989)Coarctation of the aorta. Long-term follow-up and prediction of outcome after surgical correction Circulation 80 840-845
[4]  
Shadden SC(2011)Computational fluid dynamic simulations of aortic coarctation comparing the effects of surgical- and stent-based treatments on aortic compliance and ventricular workload Catheterization Cardiovasc. Interv. 77 680-691
[5]  
Boissonnat J. D.(2012)Interdependencies of aortic arch secondary flow patterns, geometry, and age analysed by 4-dimensional phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla Eur. Radiol 22 1122-1130
[6]  
Chaine R.(2012)On the use of in vivo measured flow rates as boundary conditions for image-based hemodynamic models of the human aorta: implications for indicators of abnormal flow Ann. Biomed. Eng. 40 729-741
[7]  
Frey P.(2003)Noninvasive quantitation of blood flow turbulence in patients with aortic valve disease using online digital computer analysis of Doppler velocity data J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 16 965-974
[8]  
Malandain G.(2003)Effects of wall motion and compliance on flow patterns in the ascending aorta J. Biomech. Eng. 125 347-354
[9]  
Salmon S.(1993)Helical and retrograde secondary flow patterns in the aortic arch studied by three- directional magnetic resonance velocity mapping Circulation 88 2235-2247
[10]  
Saltel L.(2013)A numerical study of aortic flow stability and comparison with in vivo flow measurements J. Biomech. Eng. 135 011003-1100