Political Correctness: the Twofold Protection of Liberalism

被引:0
作者
Sandra Dzenis
Filipe Nobre Faria
机构
[1] King’s College London,Department of Political Economy
[2] Nova University of Lisbon,Nova Institute of Philosophy
来源
Philosophia | 2020年 / 48卷
关键词
Political correctness; Liberal science; Liberating tolerance; Enlightenment; Post-modernism; Politics of speech;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
As understood today, political correctness aims at preventing social discrimination by curtailing offensive speech and behaviour towards underprivileged groups of individuals. The core proponents of political correctness often draw on post-modernism and critical theory and are notorious for their scepticism about objective truth and scientific rationality. Conversely, the  critics of post-modern political correctness uphold Enlightenment liberal principles of scientific reasoning, rational truth-seeking and open discourse against claims of relativism and oppression. Yet, both the post-modern proponents and their Enlightenment liberal critics make up two sides of the same phenomenon of political correctness. Both sides intend to protect a liberal value system from illiberal truth-claims, which is the function of politically correct regulation. While post-modern advocates attempt to promote liberating tolerance, Enlightenment liberals place liberal values above the open-ended search for truth. Despite appearances to the contrary, this socio-academic debate is not about two sides favouring and opposing political correctness. In fact, it is a debate about the type of politically correct regulation that can better guard liberal values.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 114
页数:19
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [11] Cook P(2017)The politics of cognition: Liberalism and the evolutionary origins of victorian education British Journal for the History of Science 50 677-326
  • [12] Heilmann C(2017)Is market liberalism adaptive? Rethinking F.a. Hayek on moral evolution Journal of Bioeconomics 19 307-30
  • [13] Delgado R(2008)European liberalism. An essay in comparative political thought European Journal of Political Theory 7 9-80
  • [14] Duarte JL(2013)The evolutionary dominance of ethnocentric cooperation Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 16 7-73
  • [15] Crawford JT(1982)Prenatal gonadal hormones and sex differences in human behavior Psychological Bulletin 92 56-303
  • [16] Stern C(1994)"Imagined tyranny"? Political correctness reconsidered Academic Questions 7 51-437
  • [17] Haidt J(2005)Professors and their politics: The policy views of social scientists Critical Review 17 257-461
  • [18] Jussim L(1990)If he hollers let him go: Regulation racist speech on campus Duke Law Journal 1990 431-2381
  • [19] Tetlock PE(1994)Self-censorship in public discourse. A theory of 'political correctness' and related phenomena Rationality and Society 6 428-22
  • [20] Eddy MD(1989)Public response to racist speech: Considering the victim's story Michigan Law Review 87 2320-24