Political Correctness: the Twofold Protection of Liberalism

被引:0
作者
Sandra Dzenis
Filipe Nobre Faria
机构
[1] King’s College London,Department of Political Economy
[2] Nova University of Lisbon,Nova Institute of Philosophy
来源
Philosophia | 2020年 / 48卷
关键词
Political correctness; Liberal science; Liberating tolerance; Enlightenment; Post-modernism; Politics of speech;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
As understood today, political correctness aims at preventing social discrimination by curtailing offensive speech and behaviour towards underprivileged groups of individuals. The core proponents of political correctness often draw on post-modernism and critical theory and are notorious for their scepticism about objective truth and scientific rationality. Conversely, the  critics of post-modern political correctness uphold Enlightenment liberal principles of scientific reasoning, rational truth-seeking and open discourse against claims of relativism and oppression. Yet, both the post-modern proponents and their Enlightenment liberal critics make up two sides of the same phenomenon of political correctness. Both sides intend to protect a liberal value system from illiberal truth-claims, which is the function of politically correct regulation. While post-modern advocates attempt to promote liberating tolerance, Enlightenment liberals place liberal values above the open-ended search for truth. Despite appearances to the contrary, this socio-academic debate is not about two sides favouring and opposing political correctness. In fact, it is a debate about the type of politically correct regulation that can better guard liberal values.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 114
页数:19
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Axelrod R(2006)The evolution of ethnocentrism Journal of Conflict Resolution 50 926-936
  • [2] Hammond RA(2013)Science's immunity to moral refutation Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 633-653
  • [3] Barber A(2005)Sex differences in the brain: Implications for Explaning autism Science 310 819-823
  • [4] Baron-Cohen S(1995)Psychological sex differences: Origins through sexual selection American Psychologist 50 164-168
  • [5] Knickmeyer RC(2016)Science is not always self-correcting Foundations of Science 21 477-492
  • [6] Belmonte MK(2006)Academic freedom under fire Daedalus 134 5-17
  • [7] Buss DM(1927)Sociology and the new politics American Journal of Sociology 33 371-381
  • [8] Cofnas N(2012)Two types of self-censorship: Public and private Political Studies 61 178-196
  • [9] Cole JR(1982)Words that wound: A tort action for racial insults, epithets, and name calling Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 17 133-58
  • [10] Comte A(2015)Political diversity will improve social psychological science Behavioral and Brain Sciences 38 1-699