Shotgun metagenome data of a defined mock community using Oxford Nanopore, PacBio and Illumina technologies

被引:0
|
作者
Volkan Sevim
Juna Lee
Robert Egan
Alicia Clum
Hope Hundley
Janey Lee
R. Craig Everroad
Angela M. Detweiler
Brad M. Bebout
Jennifer Pett-Ridge
Markus Göker
Alison E. Murray
Stephen R. Lindemann
Hans-Peter Klenk
Ronan O’Malley
Matthew Zane
Jan-Fang Cheng
Alex Copeland
Christopher Daum
Esther Singer
Tanja Woyke
机构
[1] DOE Joint Genome Institute,Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
[2] 2800 Mitchell Drive,undefined
[3] NASA Ames Research Center,undefined
[4] Exobiology Branch,undefined
[5] Bay Area Environmental Research Institute,undefined
[6] Nuclear and Chemical Science Division,undefined
[7] Leibniz-Institut DSMZ-Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbH,undefined
[8] Desert Research Institute,undefined
[9] Division of Earth and Ecosystem Sciences,undefined
[10] Purdue University,undefined
[11] 610 Purdue Mall,undefined
[12] Newcastle University,undefined
[13] School of Natural and Environmental Sciences,undefined
[14] Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory,undefined
来源
Scientific Data | / 6卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Metagenomic sequence data from defined mock communities is crucial for the assessment of sequencing platform performance and downstream analyses, including assembly, binning and taxonomic assignment. We report a comparison of shotgun metagenome sequencing and assembly metrics of a defined microbial mock community using the Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) MinION, PacBio and Illumina sequencing platforms. Our synthetic microbial community BMock12 consists of 12 bacterial strains with genome sizes spanning 3.2–7.2 Mbp, 40–73% GC content, and 1.5–7.3% repeats. Size selection of both PacBio and ONT sequencing libraries prior to sequencing was essential to yield comparable relative abundances of organisms among all sequencing technologies. While the Illumina-based metagenome assembly yielded good coverage with few misassemblies, contiguity was greatly improved by both, Illumina + ONT and Illumina + PacBio hybrid assemblies but increased misassemblies, most notably in genomes with high sequence similarity to each other. Our resulting datasets allow evaluation and benchmarking of bioinformatics software on Illumina, PacBio and ONT platforms in parallel.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Shotgun metagenome data of a defined mock community using Oxford Nanopore, PacBio and Illumina technologies
    Sevim, Volkan
    Lee, Juna
    Egan, Robert
    Clum, Alicia
    Hundley, Hope
    Lee, Janey
    Everroad, R. Craig
    Detweiler, Angela M.
    Bebout, Brad M.
    Pett-Ridge, Jennifer
    Goeker, Markus
    Murray, Alison E.
    Lindemann, Stephen R.
    Klenk, Hans-Peter
    O'Malley, Ronan
    Zane, Matthew
    Cheng, Jan-Fang
    Copeland, Alex
    Daum, Christopher
    Singer, Esther
    Woyke, Tanja
    SCIENTIFIC DATA, 2019, 6 (1)
  • [2] Comparison of Oxford Nanopore Technologies and Illumina MiSeq sequencing with mock communities and agricultural soil
    Stevens, Bo Maxwell
    Creed, Tim B.
    Reardon, Catherine L.
    Manter, Daniel K.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [3] Comparison of Oxford Nanopore Technologies and Illumina MiSeq sequencing with mock communities and agricultural soil
    Bo Maxwell Stevens
    Tim B. Creed
    Catherine L. Reardon
    Daniel K. Manter
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [4] The long and short of it: benchmarking viromics using Illumina, Nanopore and PacBio sequencing technologies
    Cook, Ryan
    Brown, Nathan
    Rihtman, Branko
    Michniewski, Slawomir
    Redgwell, Tamsin
    Clokie, Martha
    Stekel, Dov J.
    Chen, Yin
    Scanlan, David J.
    Hobman, Jon L.
    Nelson, Andrew
    Jones, Michael A.
    Smith, Darren
    Millard, Andrew
    MICROBIAL GENOMICS, 2024, 10 (02):
  • [5] Automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing and antimicrobial resistance genotyping using Illumina and Oxford Nanopore Technologies sequencing data among Enterobacteriaceae
    Conzemius, Rick
    Bergman, Yehudit
    Majek, Peter
    Beisken, Stephan
    Lewis, Shawna
    Jacobs, Emily B. B.
    Tamma, Pranita D. D.
    Simner, Patricia J. J.
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [6] Comparative Analysis of PacBio and Oxford Nanopore Sequencing Technologies for Transcriptomic Landscape Identification of Penaeus monodon
    Udaondo, Zulema
    Sittikankaew, Kanchana
    Uengwetwanit, Tanaporn
    Wongsurawat, Thidathip
    Sonthirod, Chutima
    Jenjaroenpun, Piroon
    Pootakham, Wirulda
    Karoonuthaisiri, Nitsara
    Nookaew, Intawat
    LIFE-BASEL, 2021, 11 (08):
  • [7] Assembling the perfect bacterial genome using Oxford Nanopore and Illumina sequencing
    Wick, Ryan R. R.
    Judd, Louise M. M.
    Holt, Kathryn E. E.
    PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2023, 19 (03)
  • [8] Comparison of Illumina and Oxford Nanopore Sequencing Technologies for Pathogen Detection from Clinical Matrices Using Molecular Inversion Probes
    Stefan, Christopher P.
    Hall, Adrienne T.
    Graham, Amanda S.
    Minogue, Timothy D.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 24 (04): : 395 - 405
  • [9] Analysis of Wheat Virome in Korea Using Illumina and Oxford Nanopore Sequencing Platforms
    Lee, Hyo-Jeong
    Kim, Sang-Min
    Jeong, Rae-Dong
    PLANTS-BASEL, 2023, 12 (12):
  • [10] Genome Sequencing of Fiber Flax Cultivar Atlant Using Oxford Nanopore and Illumina Platforms
    Dmitriev, Alexey A.
    Pushkova, Elena N.
    Novakovskiy, Roman O.
    Beniaminov, Artemy D.
    Rozhmina, Tatiana A.
    Zhuchenko, Alexander A.
    Bolsheva, Nadezhda L.
    Muravenko, Olga V.
    Povkhova, Liubov V.
    Dvorianinova, Ekaterina M.
    Kezimana, Parfait
    Snezhkina, Anastasiya V.
    Kudryavtseva, Anna V.
    Krasnov, George S.
    Melnikova, Nataliya V.
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2021, 11