Editorial: Evidence on Questionable Research Practices: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

被引:0
作者
George C. Banks
Steven G. Rogelberg
Haley M. Woznyj
Ronald S. Landis
Deborah E. Rupp
机构
[1] Belk College of Business,University of North Carolina at Charlotte
[2] Illinois Institute of Technology,undefined
[3] Purdue University,undefined
[4] University of the Western Cape,undefined
来源
Journal of Business and Psychology | 2016年 / 31卷
关键词
Questionable research practices QRPs; Research methodology; Philosophy of science; Ethics; Research methods;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 338
页数:15
相关论文
共 178 条
[1]  
Allen PJ(2015)Detecting duplication in students’ research data: A method and illustration Ethics & Behavior 90 1307-1332
[2]  
Lourenco A(2015)Psychopathy, academic accountants’ attitudes toward unethical research practices, and publication success The Accounting Review 9 e103360-26
[3]  
Roberts LD(2014)Outlier removal and the relation with reporting errors and quality of psychological research PLoS One 52 1-20
[4]  
Bailey CD(2001)Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective Annual Review of Psychology 42 5-294
[5]  
Bakker M(2016)Questions about questionable research practices in the field of management: A guest commentary Journal of Management 6 291-289
[6]  
Wicherts JM(2013)Why we need industrial-organizational psychology to fix industrial-organizational psychology Industrial and Organizational Psychology 8 274-725
[7]  
Bandura A(2005)Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations Organizational Research Methods 9 715-636
[8]  
Banks GC(2010)Management science on the credibility bubble: Cardinal sins and various misdemeanors Academy of Management Learning & Education 97 613-29
[9]  
Banks GC(2012)Do other reports of counterproductive work behavior provide an incremental contribution over self-reports? A meta-analytic comparison Journal of Applied Psychology 7 25-414
[10]  
O’Boyle EH(2015)HARKing’s threat to organizational research: Evidence from primary and meta-analytic sources Personnel Psychology 13 395-1939