Techniques for restoration of disturbed coastal wetlands of the Great Lakes

被引:0
作者
Douglas A. Wilcox
Thomas H. Whillans
机构
[1] U.S. Geological Survey,Great Lakes Science Center
[2] Trent University,Environmental and Resource Studies
来源
Wetlands | 1999年 / 19卷
关键词
biology; chemistry; Great Lakes; hydrology; sedimentology; wetland restoration;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A long history of human-induced degradation of Great Lakes wetlands has made restoration a necessity, but the practice of wetland restoration is relatively new, especially in large lake systems. Therefore, we compiled tested methods and developed additional potential methods based on scientific understanding of Great Lakes wetland ecosytems to providc an overview of approaches for restoration. We addressed this challenge by focusing on four general fields of science: hydrology, sedimentology, chemistry, and biology. Hydrologic remediation methods include restoring hydrologic connections between diked and hydrologically altered wetlands and the lakes, restoring water tables lowered by ditching, and restoring natural variation in lake levels of regulated lakes Superior and Ontario. Sedimentological remediation methods include management of sediment input from uplands, removal or proper management of dams on tributary rivers, and restoration of protective barrier beaches and sand spits. Chemical remediation methods include reducing or eliminating inputs of contaminants from point and non-pont sources, natural sediment remediation by biodegradation and chemical degradation, and active sediment remediation by removal or byin situ treatment Biological remediation methods include control of non-target organisms, enhancing populations of target organisms, and enhancing habitat for target organisms. Some of these method were used in three major restoration projects (Metzger Marsh on Lake Erie and Cootes Paradise and Oshawa Second Marsh on Lake Ontario), which are described as case studies to show practical applications of wetland restoration in the Great Lakes. Successful restoration techniques that do not require continued manipulation must be founded in the basic tenets of ecology and should mimic natural processes. Success is demonstrated by the sustainability, productivity, nutrient-retention ability, invasibility, and biotic interactions within a restored wetland.
引用
收藏
页码:835 / 857
页数:22
相关论文
共 128 条
[1]  
Apfclbaum S. I.(1987)Ecology and control of reed canary grass (Phalaris Natural Areas Journal 7 67-74
[2]  
Sams C. E.(1990) L.) Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 28 32-36
[3]  
Ball J. P.(1997)Influence of subsequent flooding depth on cattail control by burning and mowing Hydrobiologia 342/343 311-318
[4]  
Berg S.(1993)Pike ( Occologia 94 380-387
[5]  
Jeppersen E.(1994) L.) stocking as a biomanipulation tool. 1. Effects on the fish population in Lake Lyng, Denmark Weed Science 42 134-140
[6]  
Sendergaard M.(1996)Herbivory below ground and biological weed control: life history of a root-boring weevil on purple loosestrife Hydrobiologia 340 213-218
[7]  
Blossey B.(1984)Host specificity and environmental impact of two leaf bectles ( Landscape Planning 11 35-48
[8]  
Blosey B.(1993) and Ecology 1 71-73
[9]  
Schroeder D.(1995)) for biological control of purple loosestrife, Journal of Great Lakes Research 21 587-593
[10]  
Hight S. D.(1986)Physical control of Eurasian watermilfoil in an oligotrophic lake Aquatic Botany 26 341-370