How Interests and Ideas of a Dominant Actor Make a Big Difference: Analyzing India’s Role in SAARC and BIMSTEC

被引:0
作者
Md. Foysal Jaman Shishir
Nurul Huda Sakib
机构
[1] Jahangirnagar University,Department of Government and Politics
来源
Chinese Political Science Review | 2023年 / 8卷
关键词
SAARC; BIMSTEC; India; Regionalism; Ideas; Interests; Big Actor;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
States always function as rational actors as protecting the national interests of a state depends on the choices it makes in the international context. Hence, choices and preferences are central to the study of both public policy and international relations. Policies are driven and influenced by the attention and behaviors of the actors which ultimately create a path to failure or success. In the Bay of Bengal Initiatives for Multisectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC), India, in the absence of Pakistan, can enjoy a friendly environment and establish its goal of geopolitical and economic dominance in South Asia and Southeast Asia, while countering China’s continuous upsurge. On the other hand, in the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC), constant intervention from Pakistan means that India shifts its attention to use its full potential elsewhere. This article is based on secondary sources and illustrates how the interests of a major actor (India) can shape the paths of two similar regional organizations (SAARC and BIMSTEC), despite these organizations sharing characteristics such as the same member states, the same socio-economic situation, and the same vision.
引用
收藏
页码:618 / 640
页数:22
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Agarwala N(2019)Is the Bay of Bengal regaining its lost importance? Journal of the Indian Ocean Region 15 336-345
  • [2] Saha P(2008)Interstate conflicts and regionalism in South Asia: prospects and challenges Perceptions Journal of International Affairs 13 1-19
  • [3] Ahmed ZS(1993)A domino theory of regionalism National Bureau of Economic Research 47 1-25
  • [4] Bhatnagar S(2010)Asian economic integration and sub-regionalism: A case study of the BIMSTEC International Studies 6 167-186
  • [5] Baldwin R(2021)Regionalism for realists? The evolution of the Indo-Pacific Chinese Political Science Review 226 1-12
  • [6] Batra A(2017)Political realism and international relations Philosophy Compass 32 635-665
  • [7] Beeson M(2018)SAARC vs. BIMSTEC: The search for the ideal platform for regional cooperation Observer Issue Brief 11 204-226
  • [8] Lee-Brown T(2019)The belt & road initiative and China’s influence in Southeast Asia The Pacific Review 4 16-28
  • [9] Bell D(2004)Ideas, interests and institutions in the comparative political economy of great transformations Review of International Political Economy 35 235-267
  • [10] Bhattacharjee J(2013)Impacts of BIMSTEC free trade area: A CGE analysis Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development 4 303-326