Modified Reinforced Staple Closure Technique Decreases Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula After Distal Pancreatectomy

被引:0
作者
Ryoichi Miyamoto
Naoki Sano
Michihiro Maeda
Satoshi Inagawa
Nobuhiro Ohkohchi
机构
[1] Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital,Department of Gastroenterological Surgery
[2] University of Tsukuba,Department of Surgery, Division of Gastroenterological and Hepatobiliary Surgery and Organ Transplantation
来源
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology | 2019年 / 10卷
关键词
Distal pancreatectomy; DP; Pancreatic fistula; POPF; Staple closure;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a serious complication that can occur following distal pancreatectomy (DP). Recent studies demonstrated that the use of reinforced staplers with bioabsorbable mesh significantly reduced the incidence of POPF, although the safety and efficacy of this approach remain controversial. Therefore, we originally developed a modified closure technique that combines the use of a reinforced stapler with bioabsorbable mesh with suture closure of the main pancreatic duct. The aim of this study was to determine whether our closure technique is predictive of POPF after DP. Fifty-nine consecutive patients who underwent DP were retrospectively enrolled. Based on the closure technique, we divided the cohort into a suture group (group A; n = 39) and a modified closure group (group B; n = 20). Using multivariate analysis, surgical closure techniques, including our method, and other well-known POPF risk factors were independently assessed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified no pathological fibrosis (odds ratio [OR], 5.41; p < 0.01), body mass index (> 25 kg/m2) (OR, 3.01; p = 0.02), and pancreatic stump closure technique (group A) (OR, 2.04; p = 0.01) as independent risk factors for POPF. The present study indicated that our modified closure technique is an additional useful technique to reduce POPF after DP.
引用
收藏
页码:587 / 593
页数:6
相关论文
共 256 条
[1]  
Mayo WJ(1913)I. the surgery of the pancreas: I.Injuries to the pancreas in the course of operations on the stomach. II. Injuries to the pancreas in the course of operations on the spleen. III. Resection of half the pancreas for tumor Ann Surg 58 145-150
[2]  
Fernandez-Cruz L(2016)Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic tumors: does size matter? Dig Surg 33 290-298
[3]  
Poves I(1999)Distal pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes in 235 patients Ann Surg 229 693-698
[4]  
Pelegrina A(2011)High surgical morbidity following distal pancreatectomy: still an unsolved problem World J Surg 35 1110-1117
[5]  
Burdío F(2007)Distal pancreatectomy: risk factors for surgical failure in 302 consecutive cases Ann Surg 245 573-582
[6]  
Sánchez-Cabus S(2009)Risk factors for pancreatic leak after distal pancreatectomy Ann Surg 250 277-281
[7]  
Grande L(2017)Risk factors of postoperative pancreatic fistula in patients after distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis Sci Rep 7 185-730
[8]  
Lillemoe KD(2016)Teres ligament patch reduces relevant morbidity after distal pancreatectomy (the DISCOVER randomized controlled trial) Ann Surg 264 723-2781
[9]  
Kaushal S(2016)Autologous but not fibrin sealant patches for stump coverage reduce clinically relevant pancreatic fistula in distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis World J Surg 40 2771-159
[10]  
Cameron JL(2016)Effectiveness of Tachosil(®) in the prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 401 151-890