Antimicrobials as an adjunct to pilonidal disease surgery: a systematic review of the literature

被引:0
作者
M. N. Mavros
P. K. Mitsikostas
V. G. Alexiou
G. Peppas
M. E. Falagas
机构
[1] Alfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences (AIBS),Department of Internal Medicine—Infectious Diseases
[2] Mitera Hospital,Department of Medicine
[3] Hygeia Group,undefined
[4] Tufts University School of Medicine,undefined
来源
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases | 2013年 / 32卷
关键词
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis; Pilonidal Sinus; Pilonidal Disease; Pilonidal Sinus Disease; Fast Healing;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Surgical site infection (SSI) after pilonidal disease surgery can lead to serious complications. We systematically searched the PubMed, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases for studies evaluating the use of antimicrobials as an adjunct to pilonidal disease surgery. We identified 12 eligible studies [nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs), three retrospective cohort studies], enrolling a total of 1,172 patients. No difference was observed when single-dose prophylaxis was compared to no prophylaxis or to a long course of antibiotics (seven studies, 690 patients). Similarly, gentamicin collagen sponges (GCS) did not appear to be beneficial when compared with no GCS (with primary or secondary closure; four studies, 402 patients). One study (80 patients) reported faster healing and lower SSI and recurrence rates with GCS than a 7-day course of antibiotics. The clinical heterogeneity precluded a formal meta-analysis. Although the generalization of our findings may be limited by the relative paucity and clinical heterogeneity of the existing studies, prophylactic antibiotics or GCS did not appear to be beneficial in promoting healing or reducing SSI or recurrence rates. Large, double-blind, placebo-controlled RCTs are warranted in order to further elucidate this issue.
引用
收藏
页码:851 / 858
页数:7
相关论文
共 158 条
  • [1] Søndenaa K(1995)Patient characteristics and symptoms in chronic pilonidal sinus disease Int J Colorectal Dis 10 39-42
  • [2] Andersen E(2011)Simple day-case surgery for pilonidal sinus disease Br J Surg 98 198-209
  • [3] Nesvik I(2007)Risk factors for wound complication in pilonidal sinus procedures J Am Coll Surg 205 439-444
  • [4] Søreide JA(2003)Efficacy and tolerance of a new gentamicin collagen fleece (Septocoll) after surgical treatment of a pilonidal sinus Colorectal Dis 5 222-227
  • [5] Thompson MR(2010)A prospective randomised study comparing two treatment modalities for chronic pilonidal sinus with a 5-year follow-up Int J Colorectal Dis 25 395-400
  • [6] Senapati A(2008)Healing by primary closure versus open healing after surgery for pilonidal sinus: systematic review and meta-analysis BMJ 336 868-871
  • [7] Kitchen P(2005)From conference abstract to full paper: differences between data presented in conferences and journals FASEB J 19 673-680
  • [8] Al-Khayat H(1998)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet 352 609-613
  • [9] Al-Khayat H(2008)CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting Am J Infect Control 36 309-332
  • [10] Sadeq A(1995)Surgical revision of the pilonidal sinus with single shot antibiosis Chirurg 66 220-223