Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators

被引:0
作者
F. J. Carter
M. P. Schijven
R. Aggarwal
T. Grantcharov
N. K. Francis
G. B. Hanna
J. J. Jakimowicz
机构
[1] Ninewells Hospital,The Cuschieri Skills Centre
[2] University of Dundee,Department of Surgery
[3] IJsselland Hospital,Department of Surgical Oncology and Technology
[4] Imperial College London,Ward 7, Directorate of Surgery
[5] Glostrup Hospital,Department of Surgery
[6] TUHT,undefined
[7] Ninewells Hospital,undefined
[8] Catharina Hospital,undefined
来源
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques | 2005年 / 19卷
关键词
Virtual reality; Surgical training; Validation; Simulation; Consensus guidelines;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Work Group for Evaluation and Implementation of Simulators and Skills Training Programmes is a newly formed sub-group of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons (EAES). This work group undertook a review of validation evidence for surgical simulators and the resulting consensus is presented in this article. Using clinical guidelines criteria, the evidence for validation for six different simulators was rated and subsequently translated to a level of recommendation for each system. The simulators could be divided into two basic types; systems for laparoscopic general surgery and flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy. Selection of simulators for inclusion in this consensus was based on their availability and relatively widespread usage as of July 2004. Whilst level 2 recommendations were achieved for a few systems, it was clear that there was an overall lack of published validation studies with rigorous experimental methodology. Since the consensus meeting, there have been a number of new articles, system upgrades and new devices available. The work group intends to update these consensus guidelines on a regular basis, with the resulting article available on the EAES website (http://www.eaes-eur.org ).
引用
收藏
页码:1523 / 1532
页数:9
相关论文
共 135 条
[1]  
Schijven TP(2005)Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training The Eindhoven laparoscopic cholecystectomy training course improving-150
[2]  
Grantcharov VB(2004)Virtual reality improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blind study Br J Surg 91 146-463
[3]  
Kristiansen J(2002)The transfer of basic skills learned in a laparoscopic simulator to the operating room Ann Surg 236 458-1328
[4]  
Bendix L(2002)Comparison of video trainer and virtual reality training systems on acquisition of laparoscopic skill Surg Endosc 16 1324-411
[5]  
Bardram J(2002)Does training in a virtual reality simulator improve surgical performance? Surg Endosc 16 406-129
[6]  
Rosenberg NE(2002)A virtual reality module for intravenous catheter placement Surg Endosc 16 126-175
[7]  
Seymour AG(1999)Construct validity: experts and novices performing on the Xitact LS500 laparoscopy simulator Am J Surg 177 171-810
[8]  
Gallagher SA(2003)A review of clinical guidelines Surg Endosc 17 803-964
[9]  
Roman MK(2005)Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use Virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy the-983
[10]  
O’Brian VK(2004)Evaluation and validation of a virtual reality–based flexible sigmoidoscopy trainer (Abstract) Br J Surg 91 956-A98