A novel biopsy scheme for prostate cancer: targeted and regional systematic biopsy

被引:0
作者
He, Yang [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Fan, Yu [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Song, Haitian [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Shen, Qi [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ruan, Mingjian [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Chen, Yuke [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Li, Derun [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Li, Xueying [5 ]
Liu, Yi [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Kai [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Qian [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Peking Univ First Hosp, Dept Urol, Natl Urol Canc Ctr China,Inst Urol, 8 Xishiku St, Beijing 100034, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Inst Urol, Beijing 100034, Peoples R China
[3] Treatment Ctr, Beijing Key Lab Urogenital Dis Male Mol Diag, Beijing 100034, Peoples R China
[4] Natl Urol Canc Ctr, Beijing 100034, Peoples R China
[5] Peking Univ First Hosp, Dept Stat, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Prostate cancer; Biopsy scheme; Radical prostatectomy; Regional systematic biopsy; Targeted biopsy; FUSION-GUIDED BIOPSY; MRI; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1186/s12894-024-01461-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose To explore a novel biopsy scheme for prostate cancer (PCa), and test the detection rate and pathological agreement of standard systematic (SB) + targeted (TB) biopsy and novel biopsy scheme. Methods Positive needles were collected from 194 patients who underwent SB + TB (STB) followed by radical prostatectomy (RP). Our novel biopsy scheme, targeted and regional systematic biopsy (TrSB) was defined as TB + regional SB (4 SB-needles closest to the TB-needles). The McNemar test was utilized to compare the detection rate performance for clinical significant PCa (csPCa) and clinical insignificant PCa (ciPCa). Moreover, the accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were investigated. The agreement between the different biopsy schemes grade group (GG) and RP GG were assessed. The concordance between the biopsy and the RP GG was evaluated using weighted kappa coefficient analyses. Results In this study, the overall detection rate for csPCa was 83.5% (162 of 194) when SB and TB were combined. TrSB showed better NPV than TB (97.0% vs. 74.4%). Comparing to STB, the TB-detection rate of csPCa had a significant difference (p < 0.01), while TrSB showed no significant difference (p > 0.999). For ciPCa, the overall detection rate was 16.5% (32 of 194). TrSB showed better PPV (96.6% vs. 83.3%) and NPV (97.6% vs. 92.9%) than TB. Comparing to STB, the detection rate of both schemes showed no significant difference (p = 0.077 and p = 0.375). All three schemes GG showed poor agreement with RP GG (TB: 43.3%, TrSB: 46.4%, STB: 45.9%). Using weighted kappa, all three schemes showed no difference (TB: 0.48, TrSB: 0.51, STB: 0.51). In our subgroup analysis (PI-RADS = 4/5, n = 154), all three schemes almost showed no difference (Weighted kappa: TB-0.50, TrSB-0.51, STB-0.50). Conclusion Our novel biopsy scheme TrSB (TB + 4 closest SB needles) may reduce 8 cores of biopsy compared with STB (standard SB + TB), which also showed better csPCa detection rate than TB only, but the same as STB. The pathological agreement between three different biopsy schemes (TB/TrSB/STB) GG and RP GG showed no difference.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   MRI-Targeted, Systematic, and Combined Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis [J].
Ahdoot, Michael ;
Wilbur, Andrew R. ;
Reese, Sarah E. ;
Lebastchi, Amir H. ;
Mehralivand, Sherif ;
Gomella, Patrick T. ;
Bloom, Jonathan ;
Gurram, Sandeep ;
Siddiqui, Minhaj ;
Pinsky, Paul ;
Parnes, Howard ;
Linehan, W. Marston ;
Merino, Maria ;
Choyke, Peter L. ;
Shih, Joanna H. ;
Turkbey, Baris ;
Wood, Bradford J. ;
Pinto, Peter A. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2020, 382 (10) :917-928
[2]   Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study [J].
Ahmed, Hashim U. ;
Bosaily, Ahmed El-Shater ;
Brown, Louise C. ;
Gabe, Rhian ;
Kaplan, Richard ;
Parmar, Mahesh K. ;
Collaco-Moraes, Yolanda ;
Ward, Katie ;
Hindley, Richard G. ;
Freeman, Alex ;
Kirkham, Alex P. ;
Oldroyd, Robert ;
Parker, Chris ;
Emberton, Mark .
LANCET, 2017, 389 (10071) :815-822
[3]   MRI-TRUS fusion guided prostate biopsy - initial experience and assessment of the role of contralateral lobe systematic biopsy [J].
Andras, Iulia ;
Crisan, Dana ;
Cata, Emanuel ;
Tamas-Szora, Attila ;
Caraiani, Cosmin ;
Coman, Radu-Tudor ;
Bungardean, Catalina ;
Mirescu, Claudiu ;
Coman, Ioan ;
Crisan, Nicolae .
MEDICAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY, 2019, 21 (01) :37-44
[4]   Optimizing Spatial Biopsy Sampling for the Detection of Prostate Cancer [J].
Raman, Alex G. ;
Sarma, Karthik, V ;
Raman, Steven S. ;
Priester, Alan M. ;
Mirak, Sohrab Afshari ;
Riskin-Jones, Hannah H. ;
Dhinagar, Nikhil ;
Speier, William ;
Felker, Ely ;
Sisk, Anthony E. ;
Lu, David ;
Kinnaird, Adam ;
Reiter, Robert E. ;
Marks, Leonard S. ;
Arnold, Corey W. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 (03) :596-603
[5]   Targeted transperineal biopsy of the prostate has limited additional benefit over background cores for larger MRI-identified tumors [J].
Barrett, Tristan ;
Patterson, Andrew J. ;
Koo, Brendan C. ;
Wadhwa, Karan ;
Warren, Anne Y. ;
Doble, Andrew ;
Gnanapragasam, Vincent J. ;
Kastner, Christof ;
Gallagher, Ferdia A. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 34 (04) :501-508
[6]   MRI-Targeted versus Ultrasonography-Guided Biopsy for Suspected Prostate Cancer [J].
Barry, Michael J. ;
Rosenkrantz, Andrew B. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 378 (19) :1835-1836
[7]   The Role of Ipsilateral and Contralateral Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Systematic Prostate Biopsy in Men With Unilateral Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lesion Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging-ultrasound Fusion-targeted Prostate Biopsy [J].
Bryk, Darren J. ;
Llukani, Elton ;
Taneja, Samir S. ;
Rosenkrantz, Andrew B. ;
Huang, William C. ;
Lepor, Herbert .
UROLOGY, 2017, 102 :178-182
[8]   Gleason Grade Group Concordance between Preoperative Targeted Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Histopathologic Analysis: A Comparison Between In-Bore MRI-guided and MRI-Transrectal US Fusion Prostate Biopsies [J].
Costa, Daniel N. ;
Cai, Qi ;
Xi, Yin ;
Recchimuzzi, Debora Z. ;
Subramanian, Naveen ;
Bagrodia, Aditya ;
Rofsky, Neil M. ;
Roehrborn, Claus G. ;
Hornberger, Brad ;
Shah, Rajal B. ;
Goldberg, Kenneth ;
de Leon, Alberto Diaz ;
Pedrosa, Ivan .
RADIOLOGY-IMAGING CANCER, 2021, 3 (02)
[9]   Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging, with or Without Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy, and Systematic Biopsy for Detecting Prostate Cancer: A Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Drost, Frank-Jan H. ;
Osses, Daniel ;
Nieboer, Daan ;
Bangma, Chris H. ;
Steyerberg, Ewout W. ;
Roobol, Monique J. ;
Schoots, Ivo G. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2020, 77 (01) :78-94
[10]   Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer [J].
Drost, Frank-Jan H. ;
Osses, Daniel F. ;
Nieboer, Daan ;
Steyerberg, Ewout W. ;
Bangma, Chris H. ;
Roobol, Monique J. ;
Schoots, Ivo G. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, (04)