The Epistemic Status of Processing Fluency as Source for Judgments of Truth

被引:99
作者
Reber R. [1 ]
Unkelbach C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Biological and Medical Psychology, University of Bergen, N-5020 Bergen
[2] Department of Psychology, University of Heidelberg, 69117 Heidelberg
关键词
True Belief; Stomach Cancer; Distal Criterion; Epistemic Justification; False Statement;
D O I
10.1007/s13164-010-0039-7
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This article combines findings from cognitive psychology on the role of processing fluency in truth judgments with epistemological theory on justification of belief. We first review evidence that repeated exposure to a statement increases the subjective ease with which that statement is processed. This increased processing fluency, in turn, increases the probability that the statement is judged to be true. The basic question discussed here is whether the use of processing fluency as a cue to truth is epistemically justified. In the present analysis, based on Bayes' Theorem, we adopt the reliable-process account of justification presented by Goldman (1986) and show that fluency is a reliable cue to truth, under the assumption that the majority of statements one has been exposed to are true. In the final section, we broaden the scope of this analysis and discuss how processing fluency as a potentially universal cue to judged truth may contribute to cultural differences in commonsense beliefs. © 2010 The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:563 / 581
页数:18
相关论文
共 63 条
[11]  
Buchner A., Indirect effects of synthetic grammar learning in an identification task, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, pp. 550-566, (1994)
[12]  
Clement F., To Trust or not to trust? Children's social epistemology, Review of Philosophy and Psychology, (2010)
[13]  
de Pizan C., The Book of the City of Ladies, (1405)
[14]  
Dechene A., Stahl C., Hansen J., Wanke M., Mix me a list: Context moderates the truth effect and the mere-exposure effect, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, pp. 117-1122, (2009)
[15]  
Dechene A., Stahl C., Hansen J., Wanke M., The truth about the truth: A meta-analytic review of the truth effect, Personality and Social Psychology Review, (2009)
[16]  
Deese J., On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, pp. 17-22, (1959)
[17]  
Desimone R., Miller E.K., Chelazzi L., Lueschow A., Multiple memory systems in the visual cortex, The Cognitive Neurosciences, pp. 475-490, (1995)
[18]  
Erev I., Barron G., On adaptation, maximization, and reinforcement learning among cognitive strategies, Psychological Review, 112, pp. 912-931, (2005)
[19]  
Feustel T.C., Shiffrin R.M., Salasoo A., Episodic and lexical contributions to the repetition effect in word identification, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, pp. 309-346, (1983)
[20]  
Fiedler K., Beware of samples! A cognitive-ecological sampling approach to judgment biases, Psychological Review, 107, pp. 659-676, (2000)