Rational Choice Requiem: The Decline of an Economic Paradigm and its Implications for Sociology

被引:0
作者
Zafirovski M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Sociology, University of North Texas, Denton, 76203, TX
关键词
Homo economicus; Institutional economics; Rational Choice Theory; Socio economics;
D O I
10.1007/s12108-014-9230-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The paper proposes and shows that standard rational choice theory has experienced a certain degree of breakdown or crisis in much of contemporary economic science, especially social, institutional, and related economics. It identifies and considers several instances of standard rational choice theory’s breakdown in modern economics. They are, first, the end or discredit of homo economicus, second, the rejection of the premise of exclusive economic motivation, including egoism, third, the refutation of the assumption of fixed ‘natural’ tastes and preferences, and fourth, the replacement of the conception of perfect rationality. Consequently, the paper suggests that much of contemporary economics tends to move toward a more complex and realistic post-rational and in part irrational choice theory. The paper also discusses the possible implications of this trend in contemporary economics for rational choice sociology. It concludes that the continuing expansion of rational choice theory to sociology and related social sciences may not be sustainable indefinitely if the trend continues toward its breakdown in parts of contemporary economics. © 2014, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
引用
收藏
页码:432 / 452
页数:20
相关论文
共 166 条
  • [81] Henrich J., Does culture matter in economic behavior? Ultimatum game bargaining among the Machieguenga of the Peruvian amazon, American Economic Review, 90, pp. 972-980, (2000)
  • [82] Henrich J., Et al., In search of homo economicus: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies, American Economic Review, 91, pp. 73-78, (2001)
  • [83] Hicks J., Value and capital, (1961)
  • [84] Hirschman A., The passions and the interests, (1977)
  • [85] Hodgson G., The return of institutional economics, The handbook of economic sociology, pp. 58-76, (1994)
  • [86] Hodgson G., The approach of institutional economics, Journal of Economic Literature, 36, pp. 66-192, (1998)
  • [87] Hopkins E., Kornienko T., Running to keep in the same place: Consumer choice as a game of status, American Economic Review, 94, pp. 1085-1107, (2004)
  • [88] Jensen R., Miller N., Giffen behavior and subsistence consumption, American Economic Review, 98, pp. 1553-1577, (2008)
  • [89] Kahneman D., Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics, American Economic Review, 93, pp. 1449-1475, (2003)
  • [90] Kaminsky G., Reinhart C., Vegh C., The unholy trinity of financial contagion, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17, pp. 51-74, (2003)