Prospective Study Comparing Two Brands of Cohesive Gel Breast Implants with Anatomic Shape: 5-Year Follow-Up Evaluation

[1] Baeke JL(2002)Breast deformity caused by anatomical or teardrop implant rotation Plast Reconstr Surg 109 2555-2567

[2] Boer HR(1981)Bacterial colonization of human milk South Med J 74 716-718

[3] Arnido G(2005)Cohesive silicone gel breast implants in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery Plast Reconstr Surg 116 768-779

[4] MacDonald N(1991)Textured or smooth implants for breast augmentation? A prospective controlled trial Br J Plast Surg 44 444-448

[5] Brown MH(2001)Capsular contracture around saline-filled fine textured and smooth mammary implants: A prospective 7.5-year follow-up Plast Reconstr Surg 108 2108-2112

[6] Shenker M(1989)Results of subglandular breast augmentation using a new classification method: 18-year follow-up Scand J Plast Reconstr Hand Surg 23 133-137

[7] Silver SA(1992)A clinical comparison of the tendency to capsular contracture between smooth and textured gel-filled silicone mammary implants Plast Reconstr Surg 90 247-253

[8] Coleman DJ(2003)Incidence of breast and chest wall asymmetry in breast augmentation: A retrospective analysis of 100 patients Plast Reconstr Surg 111 1520-552

[9] Foo IT(2001)Breast augmentation with anatomical cohesive gel implants: The world’s largest current experience Clin Plast Surg 28 531-332

[10] Sharpe DT(1998)A silicone implant filled with cohesive gel: advantages and disadvantages Eur J Plast Surg 21 329-192

[1] Baeke JL(2002)Breast deformity caused by anatomical or teardrop implant rotation Plast Reconstr Surg 109 2555-2567

[2] Boer HR(1981)Bacterial colonization of human milk South Med J 74 716-718

[3] Arnido G(2005)Cohesive silicone gel breast implants in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery Plast Reconstr Surg 116 768-779

[4] MacDonald N(1991)Textured or smooth implants for breast augmentation? A prospective controlled trial Br J Plast Surg 44 444-448

[5] Brown MH(2001)Capsular contracture around saline-filled fine textured and smooth mammary implants: A prospective 7.5-year follow-up Plast Reconstr Surg 108 2108-2112

[6] Shenker M(1989)Results of subglandular breast augmentation using a new classification method: 18-year follow-up Scand J Plast Reconstr Hand Surg 23 133-137

[7] Silver SA(1992)A clinical comparison of the tendency to capsular contracture between smooth and textured gel-filled silicone mammary implants Plast Reconstr Surg 90 247-253

[8] Coleman DJ(2003)Incidence of breast and chest wall asymmetry in breast augmentation: A retrospective analysis of 100 patients Plast Reconstr Surg 111 1520-552

[9] Foo IT(2001)Breast augmentation with anatomical cohesive gel implants: The world’s largest current experience Clin Plast Surg 28 531-332

[10] Sharpe DT(1998)A silicone implant filled with cohesive gel: advantages and disadvantages Eur J Plast Surg 21 329-192