Constrained SUSY seesaws with a 125 GeV Higgs

被引:0
作者
M. Hirsch
F. R. Joaquim
A. Vicente
机构
[1] AHEP Group,Departamento de Física and Centro de Física Teórica de Partículas, Instituto Superior Técnico
[2] Instituto de Física Corpuscular — C.S.I.C./Universitat de València,undefined
[3] Edificio de Institutos de Paterna,undefined
[4] Universidade Técnica de Lisboa,undefined
[5] Laboratoire de Physique Théorique,undefined
[6] CNRS — UMR 8627,undefined
来源
Journal of High Energy Physics | / 2012卷
关键词
Higgs Physics; Rare Decays; Neutrino Physics; Supersymmetric Standard Model;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Motivated by the ATLAS and CMS discovery of a Higgs-like boson with a mass around 125 GeV, and by the need of explaining neutrino masses, we analyse the three canonical SUSY versions of the seesaw mechanism (type I, II and III) with CMSSM boundary conditions. In type II and III cases, SUSY particles are lighter than in the CMSSM (or the constrained type I seesaw), for the same set of input parameters at the universality scale. Thus, to explain \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$ {m_{{{h^0}}}}\simeq 125 $\end{document} GeV at low energies, one is forced into regions of parameter space with very large values of m0, M1/2 or A0. We compare the squark and gluino masses allowed by the ATLAS and CMS ranges for \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$ {m_{{{h^{{^0}}}}}} $\end{document} (extracted from the 2011-2012 data), and discuss the possibility of distinguishing seesaw models in view of future results on SUSY searches. In particular, we briefly comment on the discovery potential of LHC upgrades, for squark/gluino mass ranges required by present Higgs mass constraints. A discrimination between different seesaw models cannot rely on the Higgs mass data alone, therefore we also take into account the MEG upper limit on BR(μ → eγ) and show that, in some cases, this may help to restrict the SUSY parameter space, as well as to set complementary limits on the seesaw scale.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 312 条
[51]  
Gunion JF(2001)Natural SUSY endures Phys. Lett. B 508 103-undefined
[52]  
Jiang Y(2003)Flavor mediation delivers natural SUSY Nucl. Phys. B 666 105-undefined
[53]  
Kraml S(2004)Radiative natural SUSY with a 125 GeV Higgs boson JHEP 01 008-undefined
[54]  
Ross GG(2007)A finely-predicted Higgs boson mass from a finely-tuned weak scale Phys. Rev. D 76 095004-undefined
[55]  
Schmidt-Hoberg K(1998)Probing high-scale and split supersymmetry with Higgs mass measurements Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 1171-undefined
[56]  
Fileviez Perez P(1977)More corrections to the Higgs mass in supersymmetry Phys. Lett. B 67 421-undefined
[57]  
Karagiannakis N(1980)Low scale supersymmetry breaking: effective description, electroweak breaking and phenomenology Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 912-undefined
[58]  
Lazarides G(1980)The MSSM fine tuning problem: a way out Phys. Rev. D 22 2227-undefined
[59]  
Pallis C(1982)Higgs physics as a window beyond the MSSM (BMSSM) Phys. Rev. D 25 774-undefined
[60]  
King S(1977)Pathways to naturally small neutrino masses Phys. Lett. B 70 433-undefined