Global Trends in Environmental Flow Assessment: An Overview

被引:6
作者
Baghel D.S. [1 ]
Gaur A. [2 ]
Karthik M. [3 ]
Dohare D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Civil Engineering, Mukesh Patel School of Technology Management and Engineering, NMIMS, Shirpur, Maharashtra
[2] Department of Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics, Shri Govindram Seksaria Institute of Technology and Science, Indore
[3] Environmental Impact and Sustainability Division, CSIR-National Environmental Engineering Research Institute, Nagpur
关键词
Eco-hydrology; Environmental flow; Instream flow; Methodologies;
D O I
10.1007/s40030-018-0332-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Diminution of riverine ecosystem is one of the major challenging issues which is caused due to the alteration of river flow in order to meet the day to day increase in requirements of human being. These alterations in river flow is mainly due to the construction of storage, diversion and control structures which are primarily for generation of electricity, irrigation and flood control. Recently, environmental flow assessment has advanced in the past decade in order to improve the environmental degradation to certain degree. This paper reviews various methods for assessing environmental flow (EF) and provides global trends. We observe that, most of the methods involve different set of data and time requirements. Moreover, the reliability of results and the level of experience required to apply the different methods are different and that no method is superior over the other. The procedure of environmental flow analysis and application is adaptive which involves likewise fluctuation in EF due to increase in the available information and change in priority and infrastructure. This review of case studies of global rivers provides an insight into the environmental flow assessment obtained through hydrological and hydraulic rating method ranged from 30 to 50% of mean annual flow. Other methods for environmental flow assessment are dependent on various ecosystems. Furthermore, the discussion on various methodologies applicable for EF assessment of Indian rivers is also provided in the article. © 2018, The Institution of Engineers (India).
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 197
页数:6
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
King J., Brown C., Sabet H., A scenario-based holistic approach to environmental flow assessments for rivers, River Res. Appl., 19, pp. 619-639, (2003)
[2]  
King J., Brown C., Environmental flows: striking the balance between development and resource protection, Ecol. Soc., 11, 2, (2006)
[3]  
Vanham D., Hoekstra A.Y., Wada Y., Bouraoui F., de Roo A., Et al., Physical water scarcity metrics for monitoring progress towards SDG target 6.4: an evaluation of indicator 6.4.2. ‘Level of water stress’, Sci. Total Environ., 613-14, pp. 218-232, (2018)
[4]  
Poff N.L., Zimmerman J.K.H., Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: a literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flows, Freshw. Biol., 55, pp. 194-205, (2010)
[5]  
Richter B.D., Davis M.M., Apse C., Konrad C., A presumptive standard for environmental flow protection, River Res. Appl., 28, 8, pp. 1312-1321, (2012)
[6]  
Bao-Zhu P., Hong-Zhu W., Xuan B., Xin-An Y., An exploratory analysis of ecological water requirements of macro-invertebrates in the Wuhan branch of the Yangtze river, Quatern. Int., 380-381, pp. 256-261, (2015)
[7]  
Smakhtin V.U., Shilpakar R.L., Hughes D.A., Hydrology-based assessment of environmental flows: an example from Nepal, Hydrol. Sci. J., 51, pp. 207-222, (2006)
[8]  
Jonard M., Furst A., Verstraeten A., Thimonier A., Timmermann V., Potocic N., Et al., Tree mineral nutrition is deteriorating in Europe, Glob. Chang. Biol., 21, pp. 418-430, (2015)
[9]  
Crossman J., Eimers M.C., Watmough S.A., Fulter M.N., Kerr J., Baker S.R., Et al., Can recovery from disturbance explain observed declines in total phosphorous in pre Cambrian shield catchments?, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 73, 8, pp. 1202-1212, (2016)
[10]  
Padikkal S., Sumam K.S., Sajikumar N., Sustainability indicators of water sharing compacts, Environ. Dev. Sustain., (2017)