Video-Based Action Learning and Research: Increased Transformative Capacity among Team Leaders of a Youth Care Protection Agency

被引:0
作者
Arnout Ernst Bunders
Emma Emily de Wit
Marcus Antonius Henricus Maria Dinkgreve
Jacqueline Elisabeth Willy Broerse
Barbara Johanna Regeer
机构
[1] Researcher at Athena Institute,Faculty of Science
[2] VU University Amsterdam,Faculty of Science
[3] Knowledge Ambassadeor at Jeugdbescherming Regio Amsterdam (Youth Protection Agency Greater Amsterdam),undefined
[4] Jeugdbescherming,undefined
[5] VU University and Director of the Athena Institute,undefined
[6] VU University Amsterdam,undefined
来源
Systemic Practice and Action Research | 2022年 / 35卷
关键词
Video; Action; Peer-learning; Research; Leadership; Transformation; Capacity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Public organizations need to learn and evolve continuously to keep up with emerging complexities. This may require a transformational organizational change, including culture, strategy, structure and working methods for service delivery. The aim of the study is to understand how a video-based reflection method could support an action learning (AL) and action research (AR) process to enhance transformative capacity among a group of team leaders in a changing youth care organization. Sixteen team leaders participated in the video-reflection process. The steps were: (1) all leaders were filmed leading a team meeting; (2) each leader reflected on a peer’s video; and (3) reflections were analyzed, and themes were abstracted. (4) Related to these themes, video fragments were compiled to share with the leaders in Focus Group Discussions (FGDs), where the leaders discussed the videos and formulated key lessons. (5) Key lessons were summarized in a report. Data collection included: video-recordings, evaluation sheets and field notes acquired during the process of video-reflection and seven months later, interviews with team leaders (n = 11) about their learning experiences. This study shows greater transformative capacity in most of the team leaders. Awareness of their work practice, as well as the process of reflexive monitoring during the FGDs, contributed to widening the scope of their reflective reality, and thus their sense of agency in adapting their practices, such as moderating their occasionally controlling behavior, being able to structure the team meetings effectively, and understanding when to use specific leadership roles.
引用
收藏
页码:855 / 876
页数:21
相关论文
共 109 条
[1]  
Bass R(2012)Disrupting ourselves: The problem of learning in higher education EDUCAUSE Review 47 23-33
[2]  
Borup J(2012)Improving online social presence through asynchronous video The Internet and Higher Education 15 195-203
[3]  
West RE(2012)Action research and collaborative management research: more than meets the eye? International Journal of Action Research 8 45-67
[4]  
Graham CR(2008)Action Learning and Action Research (ALAR): A Methodological Integration in an Inter-Organizational Setting Systemic Practice and Action Research 21 97-104
[5]  
Coghlan D(2010)Through the practice lens: Where is the bandwagon of practice-based studies heading? Manag Learn 41 265-283
[6]  
Cirella S(2012)A systematic review and thematic analysis of cinema in medical education Med Humanit 38 28-33
[7]  
Shani A(2010)The use of structuration theory to conceptualize alternative practice in education: the case of private school outreach in India Br J Sociol Educ 31 337-351
[8]  
Coghlan D(2014)Cinema education as an exercise in ‘Thinking Through Not-Thinking’ Educ Philos Theory 46 792-804
[9]  
Coughlan P(2012)Giddens à la Carte? Appraising empirical applications of Structuration Theory in management and organization studies Journal of Political Power 5 239-264
[10]  
Corradi G(2010)Resistance to organizational change: linking research and practice Leadersh Org Dev J 31 39-56