Optimized procedures and strategies for the dynamic monitoring of historical structures

被引：25

作者：

Boscato G. ^{[1
]}

Dal Cin A. ^{[2
]}

Ientile S. ^{[2
]}

Russo S. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Laboratory of Strength of Materials (LabSCo), IUAV University of Venice, Venice

[2] Department of Design and Planning in Complex Environments, IUAV University of Venice, Venice

来源：

Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring | 2016年 / 6卷 / 02期

关键词：

Accelerometric sensors; Dynamic identification; Historical structures; Simplified procedures; Structural dynamic monitoring;

D O I：

10.1007/s13349-016-0164-9

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Compared with other diagnostic techniques, which are limited to the local investigation, the structural dynamic monitoring allows to obtain information about seismic response and vulnerability of structures, in their whole. The experimental modal analysis evaluates the dynamic parameters such as frequencies, vibration modes and damping coefficients. For historic buildings, due to their heterogeneity and complexity, these data are not yet readily available. The possibility of applying the simplified procedures for the dynamic identification of the different historic structural typologies is, therefore, strategic to obtain useful information to apply the design criteria and the structural verifications in the seismic field. Besides the simplified procedures allow an optimization both on the execution time and on the costs. The paper provides some hypothesis of simplified dynamic monitoring procedures through the reduction/optimization of the accelerometric sensors used for three case studies, which differ in structural typology such as Churches, Towers and Palaces. © 2016, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

引用

页码：265 / 289

页数：24

共 43 条

[1]

Boscato G., Pizzolato M., Russo S., Tralli A., Seismic behavior of a complex historical church in L’Aquila, Int J Archit Herit Conserv Anal Restor, 8, 5, pp. 718-757, (2014)

[2]

Ceravolo R., Pistone G., Zanotti Fragonara L., Massetto S., Abbiati G., Vibration-based monitoring and diagnosis of cultural heritage: a methodological discussion by way of three examples, Int J Archit Herit, (2014)

[3]

Potenza F., Federici F., Lepidi M., Gattulli V., Graziosi F., Colarieti A., Long-term structural monitoring of the damaged Basilica S. Maria di Collemaggio through a low-cost wireless sensor network, J Civil Struct Health Monit, (2015)

[4]

Syrmakezis C.A., Seismic protection of historical structures and monuments, Struct Control Health Monit, 13, pp. 958-979, (2006)

[5]

Sepe V., Speranza E., Viskovic A., A method for large-scale vulnerability assessment of historic towers, Struct Control Health Monit, 15, pp. 389-415, (2008)

[6]

Podesta S., Riotto G., Marazzi F., Reliability of dynamic identification techiques connected to structural monitoring of monumental buildings, Struct. Control Health Monit, 15, pp. 622-641, (2008)

[7]

Samuels J.M., Reyer M., Hurlebaus S., Lucy S.H., Woodcock D.G., Bracci J.M., Wireless sensor network to monitor an historic structure under rehabilitation, J Civil Struct Health Monit, 1, 3, pp. 69-78, (2011)

[8]

Russo S., On the monitoring of historic Anime Sante church damaged by earthquake in L’Aquila, Struct Control Health Monit, 20, pp. 1226-1239, (2013)

[9]

Gallipoli M.R., Mucciarelli M.B., Sket-Motnikar B., Zupancic P., Gosar A., Prevolnik S., Herak M., Stipcevic J., Herak D., Milutinovic Z., Olumceva T., Empirical estimates of dynamic parameters on a large set of European buildings, Bull Earthq Eng, 8, pp. 593-607, (2010)

[10]

Ministero per i beni e le attività culturali, aggionamento, (2010)

← 1 2 3 4 5 →