Meta-control: From psychology to computational neuroscience

被引:0
作者
Ben Eppinger
Thomas Goschke
Sebastian Musslick
机构
[1] Concordia University,Department of Psychology
[2] Technische Universität Dresden,Faculty of Psychology
[3] Technische Universität Dresden,Collaborative Research Centre Volition and Cognitive Control
[4] Princeton University,Princeton Neuroscience Institute
来源
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience | 2021年 / 21卷
关键词
Meta-control; Cognitive control; Psychology; Cognitive neuroscience; Computational modeling;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Research in the past decades shed light on the different mechanisms that underlie our capacity for cognitive control. However, the meta-level processes that regulate cognitive control itself remain poorly understood. Following the terminology from artificial intelligence, meta-control can be defined as a collection of mechanisms that (a) monitor the progress of controlled processing and (b) regulate the underlying control parameters in the service of current task goals and in response to internal or external constraints. From a psychological perspective, meta-control is an important concept because it may help explain and predict how and when human agents select different types of behavioral strategies. From a cognitive neuroscience viewpoint, meta-control is a useful concept for understanding the complex networks in the prefrontal cortex that guide higher-level behavior as well as their interactions with neuromodulatory systems (such as the dopamine or norepinephrine system). The purpose of the special issue is to integrate hitherto segregated strands of research across three different perspectives: 1) a psychological perspective that specifies meta-control processes on a functional level and aims to operationalize them in experimental tasks; 2) a computational perspective that builds on ideas from artificial intelligence to formalize normative solutions to meta-control problems; and 3) a cognitive neuroscience perspective that identifies neural correlates of and mechanisms underlying meta-control.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 452
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Correlation = Causation? Music Training, Psychology, and Neuroscience [J].
Schellenberg, E. Glenn .
PSYCHOLOGY OF AESTHETICS CREATIVITY AND THE ARTS, 2020, 14 (04) :475-480
[32]   Culture and Neuroscience in Developmental Psychology: Contributions and Challenges [J].
Miller, Joan G. ;
Kinsbourne, Marcel .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2012, 6 (01) :35-41
[33]   Affective neuroscience: a primer with implications for forensic psychology [J].
Grimshaw, Gina M. .
PSYCHOLOGY CRIME & LAW, 2018, 24 (03) :258-278
[34]   Empiricists are from Venus, modelers are from Mars: Reconciling experimental and computational approaches in cognitive neuroscience [J].
Cowell, Rosemary A. ;
Bussey, Timothy J. ;
Saksida, Lisa M. .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2012, 36 (10) :2371-2379
[35]   Editorial: Theoretical Issues on Sensory Perception-Approaches from Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience [J].
Moutoussis, Konstantinos .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 8
[36]   Integrating psychology and neuroscience: functional analyses as mechanism sketches [J].
Gualtiero Piccinini ;
Carl Craver .
Synthese, 2011, 183 :283-311
[37]   If Neuroscience Needs Behavior, What Does Psychology Need? [J].
Parada, Francisco J. ;
Rossi, Alejandra .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 9
[38]   Editorial: Food cognition: the crossroads of psychology, neuroscience and nutrition [J].
Coricelli, Carol ;
Rioux, Camille ;
Torri, Luisa .
FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION, 2023, 10
[39]   Pseudo-mechanistic Explanations in Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience [J].
Hommel, Bernhard .
TOPICS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2020, 12 (04) :1294-1305
[40]   Bridging Media Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Challenges and Opportunities [J].
Weber, Rene ;
Eden, Allison ;
Huskey, Richard ;
Mangus, J. Michael ;
Falk, Emily .
JOURNAL OF MEDIA PSYCHOLOGY-THEORIES METHODS AND APPLICATIONS, 2015, 27 (03) :146-156