Meta-control: From psychology to computational neuroscience

被引:0
作者
Ben Eppinger
Thomas Goschke
Sebastian Musslick
机构
[1] Concordia University,Department of Psychology
[2] Technische Universität Dresden,Faculty of Psychology
[3] Technische Universität Dresden,Collaborative Research Centre Volition and Cognitive Control
[4] Princeton University,Princeton Neuroscience Institute
来源
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience | 2021年 / 21卷
关键词
Meta-control; Cognitive control; Psychology; Cognitive neuroscience; Computational modeling;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Research in the past decades shed light on the different mechanisms that underlie our capacity for cognitive control. However, the meta-level processes that regulate cognitive control itself remain poorly understood. Following the terminology from artificial intelligence, meta-control can be defined as a collection of mechanisms that (a) monitor the progress of controlled processing and (b) regulate the underlying control parameters in the service of current task goals and in response to internal or external constraints. From a psychological perspective, meta-control is an important concept because it may help explain and predict how and when human agents select different types of behavioral strategies. From a cognitive neuroscience viewpoint, meta-control is a useful concept for understanding the complex networks in the prefrontal cortex that guide higher-level behavior as well as their interactions with neuromodulatory systems (such as the dopamine or norepinephrine system). The purpose of the special issue is to integrate hitherto segregated strands of research across three different perspectives: 1) a psychological perspective that specifies meta-control processes on a functional level and aims to operationalize them in experimental tasks; 2) a computational perspective that builds on ideas from artificial intelligence to formalize normative solutions to meta-control problems; and 3) a cognitive neuroscience perspective that identifies neural correlates of and mechanisms underlying meta-control.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 452
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] APPLICATION OF NEUROSCIENCE AND COGNITIVE STUDIES IN PSYCHOLOGY
    Jamalpour, Zahra
    Jamalpour, Hamed
    Khodarahmi, Parisa A.
    Kuzhilnaya, Evgeniya
    CADERNOS EDUCACAO TECNOLOGIA E SOCIEDADE, 2024, 17 (01): : 351 - 359
  • [22] Editorial: Neuroscience, learning, and educational psychology
    Jesus Luque-Rojas, Maria
    Blanco Calvo, Eduardo
    Teresa Martin-Aragoneses, Maria
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [23] Origin and development of a psychology based on neuroscience
    Markowitsch, HJ
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PSYCHOLOGIE, 1999, 207 (3-4): : 383 - 398
  • [24] Improving robot dual-system motor learning with intrinsically motivated meta-control and latent-space experience imagination
    Hafez, Muhammad Burhan
    Weber, Cornelius
    Kerzel, Matthias
    Wermter, Stefan
    ROBOTICS AND AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS, 2020, 133
  • [25] How to be a realist about computational neuroscience
    Williams, Danielle J.
    SYNTHESE, 2025, 205 (03)
  • [26] Computational neuroscience approaches to social cognition
    Hackel, Leor M.
    Amodio, David M.
    CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 24 : 92 - 97
  • [27] Leveraging psychology and neuroscience for geospatial cognition research
    Hei, Qiaosong
    Yang, Tianyu
    Dong, Weihua
    He, Bing
    Han, Donghui
    ANNALS OF GIS, 2025, 31 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [28] SOCIAL NEUROSCIENCE AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
    Cacioppo, John T.
    Berntson, Gary G.
    Decety, Jean
    SOCIAL COGNITION, 2010, 28 (06) : 675 - 685
  • [29] Neuroscience Research on Aging and Implications for Counseling Psychology
    Wright, Stephen L.
    Diaz, Fernando
    JOURNAL OF COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 61 (04) : 534 - 540
  • [30] Neuroscience: beneficial supplementation or unnecessary appendage of psychology?
    Jaencke, Lutz
    PSYCHOLOGISCHE RUNDSCHAU, 2010, 61 (04) : 191 - 198