Middle calyx access is better for single renal pelvic stone in ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy

被引:0
作者
Yan Song
Wei Jin
Shengyu Hua
Xiang Fei
机构
[1] China Medical University,Urology Division, Sheng Jing Hospital
[2] Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Tianjin Key Laboratory of Chinese Medical Pharmacology, Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine
来源
Urolithiasis | 2016年 / 44卷
关键词
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Ultrasound; Kidney stone; Renal calyx; Renal access;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To compare the outcomes among upper calyx, middle calyx, and lower calyx access in complete ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for single renal pelvic stone. Between July 2014 and September 2015, the data of 153 patients with single renal pelvic calculi were retrospectively reviewed in this study and patients were divided to group 1 (45 patients, upper calyx access), group 2 (57 patients, middle calyx access), and group 3 (51 patients, lower calyx access). Preoperative characteristics and intraoperative and postoperative parameters were analyzed and compared. A p value of <0.05 was considered significant. Important patient- and stone-related parameters were similar among the three groups. The mean operative time was significantly shorter in the middle calyx group than the lower and upper calyx groups (41.2 ± 6.9 vs. 50.2 ± 9.3 and 46.0 ± 9.6 min, respectively). The middle calyx group had a higher stone-free rate than the lower and upper calyx groups (98.20 vs. 84.3 % and 93.3 %, respectively, p = 0.037). There were no significant differences in mean postoperative hemoglobin decrease and incidence of complications among groups (p = 0.42 and 0.862, respectively). Middle calyx access achieved superior outcomes for removal of single renal pelvic stone via ultrasound-guided PCNL.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 463
页数:4
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [1] De Rosette J(2011)The clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: indications, complications and outcomes in 5803 patients J Endourol 25 11-17
  • [2] Assimos D(1985)Kidney stone removal: percutaneous versus surgical lithotomy J Urol 133 6-12
  • [3] Desai M(1989)The role of percutaneous surgery in renal and ureteral stone removal J Urol 141 780-781
  • [4] Brannen GE(2009)Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn calculi: a single center’s experience over 15 years J Endourol 23 1669-1673
  • [5] Bush WH(2009)Chinese minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: the Guangzhou experience J Endourol 23 1693-1697
  • [6] Correa RJ(2005)Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with ultrasonography-guided renal access: experience from over 300 cases BJU Int 96 875-878
  • [7] Segura JW(2004)Upper pole access for complex lower pole renal calculi BJU Int 94 849-852
  • [8] Soucy F(2003)Complications associated with percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: supra-versus subcostal access: a retrospective study Acta Radiol 44 447-451
  • [9] Ko R(2013)Middle calyx access in complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy Can Urol Assoc J 7 e306-e310
  • [10] Duvdevani M(2014)Analgesic use and complications following upper pole access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy J Endourol 28 909-914