Reimbursement and clinical guidance for pharmaceuticals in Sweden: Do health-economic evaluations support decision making?

被引:20
作者
Anell A. [1 ,2 ]
Persson U. [1 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Institute for Health Economics, Lund
[2] Swedish Institute for Health Economics, S-220 02 Lund
关键词
Clinical guidance; Cost-effectiveness; Pharmaceuticals; Reimbursement; Sweden;
D O I
10.1007/s10198-005-0301-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction of the new Pharmaceutical Benefits Board (LFN; 1 October 2002) has markedly changed the principles of pricing and reimbursement of drugs in Sweden. The Board is required to make decisions based on information on cost-effectiveness, and pharmaceutical companies must submit economic evaluations when relevant as part of their applications for reimbursement. This study examined experience to date regarding the use of health-economic evaluations and cost-effectiveness information by the LFN. We also describe activities and the use of cost-effectiveness analysis by Swedish local formulary committees organized by the 21 county councils. It is concluded that economic evaluations have supported decision making by LFN, although cost-effectiveness seems to be of varying importance in different situations. While the use of health-economic evaluations and the outcome of decision making by LFN are similar to comparable committees in other countries, there is presently a gap in this sense between the LFN and Swedish local formulary committees. Coordinated decision making is much needed but may be difficult to implement as the perspective, expertise, and objectives of the two public authorities differ. © Springer Medizin Verlag 2005.
引用
收藏
页码:274 / 279
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Hoffman C., Graf Von Der Schulenburg M.J., The influence of economic evaluation studies on decision making - A European survey, Health Policy, 52, pp. 179-192, (2000)
  • [2] Anell A., Priority setting for pharmaceuticals - The use of economic evidence by reimbursement and clinical guidance committees, Eur J Health Econ, 5, pp. 28-35, (2004)
  • [3] Lundkvist J., Pricing and reimbursement of drugs in Sweden, Eur J Health Econ, 3, pp. 66-70, (2002)
  • [4] Persson U., Anell A., Persson M., Parallellhandel Med Läkemedel I Sverige - En Ekonomisk Analys (Parallel Trade of Pharmaceuticals in Sweden - An Economic Analysis), (2001)
  • [5] Apoteket A.B., Landstingsförbundet, Läkemedelsförmånsnämnden (2003-06-30) Utbyte Av Läkemedel. En Uppföljning Av de Första Sex Månaderna Med Den Nya Reformen (Substitution of Pharmaceuticals. Experiences Following the First Six Months after the New Reform), (2003)
  • [6] Anell A., Svarvar P., Pharmacoeconomics and clinical practice guidelines - A survey of attitudes in Swedish formulary committees, Pharmacoeconomics, 17, pp. 175-185, (2000)
  • [7] Persson U., Anell A., Persson U., Anell A., Nordling S., Pris, Subvention Och Läkemedel-användning Av Hälsoekonomiska Utvärderingar (Price, Reimbursement and Pharmaceuticals-use of Health Economic Evaluations), (2002)
  • [8] En Uppföljning Av Läkemedelskommittéernas Arbete-Hur Påverkas Läkemedelsanvändningen? (Review of Activities of Fomulary Commttees), (2003)
  • [9] Melander A., Nilsson L.-G., Läkares Relationer Till Läkemedelskommittéer. Attityder Och Faktisk Förskrivning (Physicians Attitudes Towards Formulary Committees and Actual Prescribing Patterns), (2001)
  • [10] Nordling S., Anell A., Jansson S., Kostnadsansvar Och Belöningssystem for Förbättrad Läkemedelsanvändning (Budget Responsibility and Incentive Schemes for a Rational Use of Drugs), (2003)