Brain regulation of emotional conflict predicts antidepressant treatment response for depression

被引:0
作者
Gregory A. Fonzo
Amit Etkin
Yu Zhang
Wei Wu
Crystal Cooper
Cherise Chin-Fatt
Manish K. Jha
Joseph Trombello
Thilo Deckersbach
Phil Adams
Melvin McInnis
Patrick J. McGrath
Myrna M. Weissman
Maurizio Fava
Madhukar H. Trivedi
机构
[1] The University of Texas at Austin,Department of Psychiatry, Dell Medical School
[2] Stanford University,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
[3] Stanford University,Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute
[4] Sierra Pacific Mental Illness Research,Department of Psychiatry
[5] Education and Clinical Center in the Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System,Department of Psychiatry
[6] University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center,New York State Psychiatric Institute and Department of Psychiatry
[7] Massachusetts General Hospital,Department of Psychiatry
[8] College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University,undefined
[9] University of Michigan,undefined
来源
Nature Human Behaviour | 2019年 / 3卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The efficacy of antidepressant treatment for depression is controversial due to the only modest superiority demonstrated over placebo. However, neurobiological heterogeneity within depression may limit overall antidepressant efficacy. We sought to identify a neurobiological phenotype responsive to antidepressant treatment by testing pretreatment brain activation during response to, and regulation of, emotional conflict as a moderator of the clinical benefit of the antidepressant sertraline versus placebo. Using neuroimaging data from a large randomized controlled trial, we found widespread moderation of clinical benefits by brain activity during regulation of emotional conflict, in which greater downregulation of conflict-responsive regions predicted better sertraline outcomes. Treatment-predictive machine learning using brain metrics outperformed a model trained on clinical and demographic variables. Our findings demonstrate that antidepressant response is predicted by brain activity underlying a key self-regulatory emotional capacity. Leveraging brain-based measures in psychiatry will forge a path toward better treatment personalization, refined mechanistic insights and improved outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1319 / 1331
页数:12
相关论文
共 149 条
[1]  
Hasin Deborah S.(2018)Epidemiology of Adult DSM-5 Major Depressive Disorder and Its Specifiers in the United States JAMA Psychiatry 75 336-1586
[2]  
Sarvet Aaron L.(2009)Monoaminergic neurotransmission: the history of the discovery of antidepressants from 1950s until today Curr. Pharm. Des. 15 1563-275
[3]  
Meyers Jacquelyn L.(2017)Adult utilization of psychiatric drugs and differences by sex, age, and race JAMA Intern. Med. 177 274-300
[4]  
Saha Tulshi D.(2015)Antidepressants versus placebo in major depression: an overview World Psychiatry 14 294-53
[5]  
Ruan W. June(2008)Initial severity and antidepressant benefits: a meta-analysis of data submitted to the food and drug administration PLoS Med. 5 e45-1366
[6]  
Stohl Malka(2010)Antidepressant drug effects and depression severity: a patient-level meta-analysis JAMA 303 47-38
[7]  
Grant Bridget F.(2018)Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant drugs for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis Lancet 391 1357-679
[8]  
Lopez-Munoz F(2017)Resting-state connectivity biomarkers define neurophysiological subtypes of depression Nat. Med. 23 28-700
[9]  
Alamo C(2016)Messages for clinicians: moderators and mediators of treatment outcome in randomized clinical trials Am. J. Psychiatry 173 672-412
[10]  
Moore TJ(2015)The neural bases of emotion regulation Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 16 693-1484