Genotoxicity evaluation of water soil leachates by Ames test, comet assay, and preliminary Tradescantia micronucleus assay

被引:1
作者
B. Lah
T. Vidic
E. Glasencnik
T. Cepeljnik
G. Gorjanc
Romana Marinsek-Logar
机构
[1] University of Ljubljana,Zootechnical Department, Biotechnical Faculty
[2] University of Ljubljana,Biotechnical Faculty, Department of Biology
[3] Environmental Research & Industrial Co-operation Institute,ERICo Velenje
来源
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment | 2008年 / 139卷
关键词
Soil; In vitro bioassays; Water soil leachates; Genotoxicity; Ames test; Comet assay; micronucleus test;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Combining genotoxicity/mutagenicity tests and physico-chemical methodologies can be useful for determining the potential genotoxic contaminants in soil samples. The aim of our study was to evaluate the genotoxicity of soil by applying an integrated physico-chemical-biological approach. Soil samples were collected at six sampling points in a Slovenian industrial and agricultural region where contamination by heavy metals and sulphur dioxide (SO2) are primarily caused by a nearby power plant. The in vitro alkaline version of the comet assay on water soil leachates was performed with Caco-2 and HepG2 cells. A parallel genotoxicity evaluation of the samples was performed by Ames test using Salmonella typhimurium and the Tradescantia micronucleus test. Pedological analyses, heavy metal content determination, and different physico-chemical analyses, were also performed utilizing standard methodology. Water leachates of soil samples were prepared according to standard methods. Since only a battery of biotests with prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms or cells can accurately estimate the effects of (geno)toxicants in soil samples and water soil leachates, a combination of three bioassays, with cells or organisms belonging to different trophic levels, was used. Genotoxicity of all six water soil leachates was proven by the comet assay on both human cell lines, however no positive results were detected by bacterial assay, Ames test. The Tradescantia micronucleus assay showed increase in micronuclei formation for three samples. According to these results we can assume that the comet assay was the most sensitive assay, followed by the micronucleus test. The Ames test does not appear to be sensitive enough for water soil leachates genotoxicity evaluations where heavy metal contamination is anticipated.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 118
页数:11
相关论文
共 188 条
[1]  
Basu A.(2001)Genetic toxicology of a paradoxical human carcinogen arsenic: A review Mutation Research 488 17-194
[2]  
Mahat J.(2002)Evaluation of toxic and genotoxic potential of stabilized industrial waste and contaminated soils Waste Management 22 241-247
[3]  
Gupta S.(1999)Use of in vitro (Ames and Mutatox tests) assays to assess the genotoxicity of leachates from contaminated soil Organic Geochemistry 30 953-962
[4]  
Giri A. K.(1999)Toxicity and genotoxicity of industrial soils polluted by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) Organic Geochemistry 30 947-952
[5]  
Békaert C.(2005)Induction of micronuclei and nuclear abnormalities in Aquatic Toxicology 74 264-271
[6]  
Ferrier V.(2003) following exposure to petroleum refinery and chromium processing plant effluents Science of the Total Environment 301 139-150
[7]  
Marty J.(1999)Evaluation of the genotoxic and teratogenic potential of a municipal sludge and sludge-amended soil using the amphibian Mutation Research Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis 426 167-171
[8]  
Pfohl-Leszkowicz A.(2005) and the tobacco: Water Research 39 1105-1113
[9]  
Bispo A.(1997) L. var xanthi Dulieu Mutation Research 340 141-151
[10]  
Jourdain M. J.(2000)Assessment of the genotoxicity of contaminated soil with the Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 46 73-80