Sympatric Speciation in the Post “Modern Synthesis” Era of Evolutionary Biology

被引:0
作者
Christopher E. Bird
Iria Fernandez-Silva
Derek J. Skillings
Robert J. Toonen
机构
[1] Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi,Department of Life Sciences
[2] University of Hawai’i,Hawai’i Institute of Marine Biology
来源
Evolutionary Biology | 2012年 / 39卷
关键词
Lineage; Population; Divergence; Selection; Gene flow;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Sympatric speciation is among the most controversial and challenging concepts in evolution. There are a multitude of definitions of speciation alone, and when combined with the biogeographic concept of sympatric range overlap, consensus on what sympatric speciation is, whether it happens, and its importance, is even more difficult to achieve. Providing the basis upon which to define and judge sympatric speciation, the Modern Evolutionary Synthesis (Huxley in Evolution: the modern synthesis. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1942) led to the conclusion that sympatric speciation is an inconsequential process in the generation of species diversity. In the post Modern Synthesis era of evolutionary biology, the PCR revolution and associated accumulation of DNA sequence data from natural populations has led to a resurgence of interest in sympatric speciation, and more importantly, the role of natural selection in lineage diversification. Much effort is currently being devoted to elucidating the processes by which the constituents of an initially panmictic population can become reproductively isolated and evolve some level of reproductive incompatibility without the complete cessation of gene flow due to geographic barriers. The evolution of reproductive isolation solely due to natural selection is perhaps the most controversial manner by which sympatric speciation occurs, and it is that which we focus upon in this review. Mathematical model simulations indicate that even strict definitions of sympatric speciation are possible to satisfy, empirical data consistent with sympatric divergence are accumulating, but irrefutable evidence of sympatric speciation in natural populations remains elusive. Genomic investigations are advancing our ability to identify genetic patterns caused by natural selection, thereby advancing our understanding of the power of natural selection relative to gene flow. Overall, sympatric lineage divergence, especially at the sub-species level, may have led to a substantial portion of biodiversity.
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 180
页数:22
相关论文
共 377 条
[1]  
Adachi-Hagimori T(2011)Gene flow between sexual and asexual strains of parasitic wasps: A possible case of sympatric speciation caused by a parthenogenesis-inducing bacterium Journal of Evolutionary Biology 24 1254-1262
[2]  
Miura K(2010)Genomics and the future of conservation genetics Nature Reviews Genetics 11 697-709
[3]  
Abe Y(2010)A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing Nature 467 1061-1073
[4]  
Allendorf FW(1997)Phylogenetics and the origin of species Procedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 94 7748-7755
[5]  
Hohenlohe PA(2009)How sympatric is speciation in the Molecular Ecology 18 3629-3638
[6]  
Luikart G(2008) palms of Lord Howe Island? PLoS ONE 3 e3376-918
[7]  
Altshuler DL(2007)Rapid SNP discovery and genetic mapping using sequenced RAD markers The Plant Journal 51 910-723
[8]  
Durbin RM(2010)SNP discovery via 454 transcriptome sequencing BMC Evolutionary Biology 10 326-433
[9]  
Abecasis GR(2006)Phylogeography, colonization and population history of the Midas cichlid species complex ( Nature 439 719-1840
[10]  
Bentley DR(2000) spp.) in the Nicaraguan crater lakes American Naturalist 155 419-2035