Dynamics of water-use efficiency and status in promising Hevea brasiliensis genotypes: implications for clonal selection

被引:0
作者
Armando Sterling
Natalia Rodríguez
Edwin Andrés Clavijo-Arias
Yurani Paola Claros-Loaiza
Juan Carlos Suárez Salazar
机构
[1] Instituto Amazónico de Investigaciones Científicas SINCHI – Universidad de la Amazonia,Laboratorio de Fitopatología
[2] Universidad de la Amazonia,Laboratorio de Ecofisiología
[3] Programa de Ingeniería Agroecológica,undefined
来源
Journal of Rubber Research | 2021年 / 24卷
关键词
Rubber tree; Water-use efficiency; Water status; Water conservation; Seasonality; Diurnal cycle;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The rubber trees (Hevea brasiliensis) are exposed to water limitations in the Amazon region that can affect its physiology, making it necessary to select genotypes that are best adapted. This study analyzed the diurnal and seasonal changes in water use and status using traits of gas exchange and water relations in ten rubber tree genotypes in the immaturity phase from large-scale clone trials at three localities in the northwestern Colombian Amazon. In San Vicente del Caguán (semi-humid warm climate), the greatest means for water-use efficiency (WUEe and WUEi) and leaf water potential (ΨL) were observed, in contrast with Belén de los Andaquíes (humid warm) where there was a higher relative water content (RWC). Florencia (humid warm) presented high averages for WUEe and WUEi similar to San Vicente del Caguán. The WUEe and WUEi were greater in the dry season, contrary to those observed in ΨL and RWC. The WUEe was higher in the time range 9:00 to 12:00, while ΨL had a greater mean at 3:00 and a lower average at 12:00. In the dry season, the more efficient genotypes for water use had a higher leaf water potential as well as a lower relative water content, and had an extreme anisohydric behavior. In the wet season, these had a partial isohydric strategy. The FX 4098, MDF 180 and FDR 5597 genotypes were selected because of their greater adaptive capacity for water use and status, as compared to clone IAN 873 (control), which makes them desirable for future climate drought scenarios.
引用
收藏
页码:669 / 684
页数:15
相关论文
共 213 条
[1]  
Venkatachalam P(2013)Natural rubber producing plants: an overview African J Biotechnol 12 1297-1310
[2]  
Geetha N(2012)Temporal stability of vigor in rubber tree genotypes in the pre- and post-tapping phases using different methods Euphytica 63 246-254
[3]  
Sangeetha P(2006)Genetic variability for girth growth and rubber yield in Sci Agric 203 285-293
[4]  
Thulaseedharan A(2015)Genetic variability and predicted genetic gains for yield and laticifer system traits of rubber tree families Euphytica 33 193-203
[5]  
Gouvêa L(2017)Associations among rubber yield and secondary traits in juvenile rubber trees progeny Euphytica 44 659-670
[6]  
Silva G(2019)Comparative morphology of in vivo and in vitro laticiferous cells and potential use of in vitro laticifers in early selection of rubber tree clones Trees - Struct Funct 158 13-20
[7]  
Verardi C(2018)A review of a century of studies on South American leaf blight of the rubber tree Plant Dis 1 245-255
[8]  
Silva J(2013)Breeding Ind Crops Prod 19 633-644
[9]  
Scaloppi-Junior E(2020) for yield, growth and SALB resistance for high disease environments Colombia Ind Crops Prod 14 1757-1767
[10]  
Gonçalves P(1985)Assessing growth, early yielding and resistance in rubber tree clones under low South American Leaf Blight pressure in the Amazon region J Rubber Res Inst Sri Lanka 18 535-541