Measuring Engagement at Work: Validation of the Chinese Version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale

被引:0
作者
Ted Chun-tat Fong
Siu-man Ng
机构
[1] The University of Hong Kong,Department of Social Work & Social Administration
来源
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine | 2012年 / 19卷
关键词
Work engagement; Validity; Reliability; Chinese;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 397
页数:6
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Seligman MEP(2000)Positive psychology: an introduction Am Psychol 55 5-14
[2]  
Csikszentmihalyi M(2002)The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior J Organ Behav 23 695-706
[3]  
Luthans F(2002)The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach Journal of Happiness Studies 3 71-92
[4]  
Schaufeli WB(2006)The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire—a cross-national study Educ Psychol Meas 66 701-716
[5]  
Salanova M(2004)Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi-sample study J Organ Behav 25 293-315
[6]  
Gonzalez-Roma V(2009)Burnout versus work engagement in their effects on 24-hour ambulatory monitored cardiac autonomic function Stress Heal 25 323-331
[7]  
Bakker AB(2010)Factorial validity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) across occupational groups in Norway Scand J Psychol 51 326-333
[8]  
Schaufeli WB(2008)Work engagement in Japan: validation of the Japanese version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale Appl Psychol Int Rev 57 510-523
[9]  
Bakker AB(2007)The job demands–resources model: state of the art J Manag Psychol 22 309-328
[10]  
Salanova M(2006)Burnout and work engagement among teachers J Sch Psychol 43 495-513