Accuracy of photogrammetry, intraoral scanning, and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: an in vitro comparative study

[1] Jemt T(2012)In vitro measurements of precision of fit of implant-supported frameworks. A comparison between "virtual" and "physical" assessments of fit using two different techniques of measurements Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 14 e175-e182

[2] Hjalmarsson L(2013)Effect of framework material and vertical misfit on stress distribution in implant-supported partial prosthesis under load application: 3-D finite element analysis Acta Odontol Scand 71 1243-1249

[3] Bacchi A(1991)A comparison of impression materials for complete-arch fixed partial dentures J Prosthet Dent 65 165-169

[4] Consani RL(2006)Displacement of implant components from impressions to definitive casts Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 21 747-755

[5] Mesquita MF(2012)Delayed linear dimensional changes of five high strength gypsum products used for the fabrication of definitive casts J Prosthet Dent 108 189-195

[6] Dos Santos MB(2018)Digital versus conventional impressions in fixed prosthodontics: a review J Prosthodont 27 35-41

[7] Dounis GS(2021)A clinical study comparing digital scanning and conventional impression making for implant-supported prostheses: a crossover clinical trial J Prosthet Dent 21 37-472

[8] Ziebert GJ(2021)The direct digital workflow in fixed implant prosthodontics: a narrative review BMC Oral Health 27 465-1367

[9] Dounis KS(2016)Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes Clin Oral Implants Res 28 1360-380

[10] Kim S(2017)Digital vs. conventional full-arch implant impressions: a comparative study Clin Oral Implants Res 34 366-1288

[1] Jemt T(2012)In vitro measurements of precision of fit of implant-supported frameworks. A comparison between "virtual" and "physical" assessments of fit using two different techniques of measurements Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 14 e175-e182

[2] Hjalmarsson L(2013)Effect of framework material and vertical misfit on stress distribution in implant-supported partial prosthesis under load application: 3-D finite element analysis Acta Odontol Scand 71 1243-1249

[3] Bacchi A(1991)A comparison of impression materials for complete-arch fixed partial dentures J Prosthet Dent 65 165-169

[4] Consani RL(2006)Displacement of implant components from impressions to definitive casts Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 21 747-755

[5] Mesquita MF(2012)Delayed linear dimensional changes of five high strength gypsum products used for the fabrication of definitive casts J Prosthet Dent 108 189-195

[6] Dos Santos MB(2018)Digital versus conventional impressions in fixed prosthodontics: a review J Prosthodont 27 35-41

[7] Dounis GS(2021)A clinical study comparing digital scanning and conventional impression making for implant-supported prostheses: a crossover clinical trial J Prosthet Dent 21 37-472

[8] Ziebert GJ(2021)The direct digital workflow in fixed implant prosthodontics: a narrative review BMC Oral Health 27 465-1367

[9] Dounis KS(2016)Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes Clin Oral Implants Res 28 1360-380

[10] Kim S(2017)Digital vs. conventional full-arch implant impressions: a comparative study Clin Oral Implants Res 34 366-1288