Clinical comparison of Kedo-S paediatric rotary files vs manual instrumentation for root canal preparation in primary molars: a double blinded randomised clinical trial

被引：172

作者：

Jeevanandan G. ^{[1
]}

Govindaraju L. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Paediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Chennai, Tamil Nadu

来源：

European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry | 2018年 / 19卷 / 4期

关键词：

K-files; Kedo-S files; Primary molars; Pulpectomy;

D O I：

10.1007/s40368-018-0356-6

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Aim: This was to compare and evaluate the instrumentation time and quality of obturation between paediatric rotary file (Kedo-S) and manual instrumentation techniques in primary molars. Methods: A double blinded randomised control trial was performed that included mandibular primary molars in children of age 4–7 years with pulp necrosis. Sixty primary mandibular molars were randomly divided into two groups: 30 were instrumented with paediatric rotary files Kedo-S (experimental group) and 30 with hand K-files (control group). During the preparation of the primary root canals the instrumentation time was recorded in seconds. The quality of obturation was recorded as optimal, under filled or over filled using immediate post-operative radiographs. The instrumentation time and quality of obturation were analysed using independent t-test and Chi-square test. Results: Mean instrumentation time with paediatric rotary files Kedo-S (78.53 s) was significantly less than K-files (95.46 s) (p < 0.05). There was a significant improvement in the quality of obturation (p < 0.05) with paediatric rotary files (Kedo-S). Conclusion: Clinical use of paediatric rotary files Kedo-S was effective during root canal preparation of primary teeth with reduction in instrumentation time and better quality of obturation. © 2018, European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry.

引用

页码：273 / 278

页数：5

共 21 条

[1]

Altman D., Schulz K., Moher D., Et al., The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration, Ann Intern Med, 134, pp. 663-694, (2001)

[2]

Barr E.S., Kleier D.J., Barr N.V., Use of nickel-titanium rotary files for root canal preparation in primary teeth, Pediatr Dent, 22, pp. 77-78, (2000)

[3]

Coll J.A., Sadrian R., Predicting pulpectomy success and its relationship to exfoliation and succedaneous dentition, Pediatr Dent, 18, pp. 57-63, (1996)

[4]

Crespo S., Cortes O., Garcia C., Perez L., Comparison between rotary and manual instrumentation in primary teeth, J Clin Pediatr Dent, 32, pp. 295-298, (2008)

[5]

Finn S.B., Morphology of primary teeth, Clinical Pedodontics, pp. 59-70, (1973)

[6]

Fuks A.B., Papagiannoulis L., Pulpotomy in primary teeth: review of the literature according to standardized criteria, Eur Arch Paediatr Dent, 7, pp. 64-71, (2006)

[7]

Govindaraju L., Jeevanandan G., Subramanian E., Knowledge and practice of rotary instrumentation in primary teeth among Indian dentists: a questionnaire survey, J Int Oral Health, 9, pp. 45-48, (2017)

[8]

Haapasalo M., Endal U., Zandi H., Coil J.M., Eradication of endodontic infection by instrumentation and irrigation solutions, Endodontic Topics, 10, pp. 77-102, (2005)

[9]

Jeevanandan G., Kedo S paediatric rotary files for root canal preparation in primary teeth—case report, J Clin Diagn Res, 11, (2017)

[10]

Kuo C., Wang Y., Chang H., Et al., Application of Ni–Ti rotary files for pulpectomy in primary molars, J Dent Sci, 1, pp. 10-15, (2006)

← 1 2 3 →