The DNMT3A R882H mutation does not cause dominant negative effects in purified mixed DNMT3A/R882H complexes

被引:0
作者
Max Emperle
Michael Dukatz
Stefan Kunert
Katharina Holzer
Arumugam Rajavelu
Renata Z. Jurkowska
Albert Jeltsch
机构
[1] Stuttgart University,Department of Biochemistry, Institute of Biochemistry and Technical Biochemistry
[2] Rajiv Gandhi Center for Biotechnology (RGCB),undefined
[3] BioMed X Innovation Center,undefined
来源
Scientific Reports | / 8卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The DNA methyltransferase DNMT3A R882H mutation is observed in 25% of all AML patients. DNMT3A is active as tetramer and the R882H mutation is located in one of the subunit/subunit interfaces. Previous work has reported that formation of mixed wildtype/R882H complexes leads to a strong loss of catalytic activity observed in in vitro DNA methylation assays (Russler-Germain et al., 2014, Cancer Cell 25:442–454). To investigate this effect further, we have prepared mixed wildtype/R882H DNMT3A complexes by incubation of individually purified subunits of the DNMT3A catalytic domain and full-length DNMT3A2. In addition, we have used a double affinity tag approach and specifically purified mixed catalytic domain complexes formed after co-expression of R882H and wildtype subunits in E. coli cells. Afterwards, we determined the catalytic activity of the mixed complexes and compared it to that of purified complexes only consisting of one subunit type. In both settings, the expected catalytic activities of mixed R882H/wildtype complexes were observed demonstrating an absence of a dominant negative effect of the R882H mutation in purified DNMT3A enzymes. This result suggests that heterocomplex formation of DNMT3A and R882H is unlikely to cause dominant negative effects in human cells as well. The limitations of this conclusion and its implications are discussed.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 97 条
  • [1] Allis CD(2016)The molecular hallmarks of epigenetic control Nat Rev Genet 17 487-500
  • [2] Jenuwein T(2015)Function and information content of DNA methylation Nature 517 321-326
  • [3] Schubeler D(2017)Dynamics and Context-Dependent Roles of DNA Methylation J Mol Biol 429 1459-1475
  • [4] Ambrosi C(2011)Structure and function of mammalian DNA methyltransferases Chembiochem 12 206-222
  • [5] Manzo M(2016)Allosteric control of mammalian DNA methyltransferases–a new regulatory paradigm Nucleic acids research 44 8556-8575
  • [6] Baubec T(2016)Role of TET enzymes in DNA methylation, development, and cancer Genes Dev 30 733-750
  • [7] Jurkowska RZ(2011)A decade of exploring the cancer epigenome - biological and translational implications Nat Rev Cancer 11 726-734
  • [8] Jurkowski TP(2013)DNA methylation dynamics in health and disease Nat Struct Mol Biol 20 274-281
  • [9] Jeltsch A(2016)Epigenetic modulators, modifiers and mediators in cancer aetiology and progression Nat Rev Genet 17 284-299
  • [10] Jeltsch A(2012)Cancer genetics and epigenetics: two sides of the same coin? Cancer Cell 22 9-20