A multi-objective mixed-discrete particle swarm optimization with multi-domain diversity preservation

被引:0
作者
Weiyang Tong
Souma Chowdhury
Achille Messac
机构
[1] Syracuse University,Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
[2] Department of Aerospace Engineering,undefined
来源
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization | 2016年 / 53卷
关键词
Diversity preservation; Mixed-discrete; PSO; Multi-objective; Wind farm layout optimization;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Among population-based optimization algorithms guided by meta-heuristics, Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) has gained significant popularity in the past two decades, particularly due to its ease of implementation and fast convergence capabilities. This paper seeks to translate the beneficial features of PSO from solving typical continuous single-objective problems to solving multi-objective mixed-discrete problems, which is relatively a new ground for PSO application. The original Mixed-Discrete PSO (MDPSO) algorithm, which included an exclusive diversity preservation technique to significantly mitigate premature particle clustering, has been shown to be a powerful single-objective solver for highly constrained MINLP problems. This papers makes fundamental advancements to MDPSO, enabling it to solve complex multi-objective problems with mixed-discrete design variables. Specifically, in the velocity update equation for any particle, the explorative term is modified to point towards a stochastically selected non-dominated solution at that iteration − thereby adopting the concept of multi-leader swarms. The fractional domain in the diversity preservation technique, which was previously defined in terms of the best global particle, is now formulated as a function of the extreme members in the set of intermediate Pareto optimal solutions. With this advancement, diversity preservation not only mitigates premature particle stagnation, but also promotes more uniform coverage of the Pareto frontier. The multi-objective MDPSO algorithm is tested using a set of benchmark problems and a wind farm layout optimization problem. To illustrate the competitive benefits of the new MO-MDPSO algorithm, the results are compared with those given by other popular multi-objective solvers such as NSGA-II and SPEA.
引用
收藏
页码:471 / 488
页数:17
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
Baumgartner U(2004)Pareto optimality and particle swarm optimization IEEE Trans Magn 40 1172-1175
[2]  
Magele C(2009)Modified predator-prey algorithm for constrained and unconstrained multi-objective optimisation Int J Math Model Numer Optimisation 1 1-38
[3]  
Renhart W(2013)A mixed-discrete particle swarm optimization algorithm with explicit diversity-preservation Struct Multidiscip Optim 47 367-388
[4]  
Chowdhury S(2013)Optimizing the arrangement and the selection of turbines for wind farms subject to varying wind conditions Renew Energy 52 273-282
[5]  
Dulikravich GS(2004)Handling multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization IEEE Trans Evol Comput 8 256-279
[6]  
Moral RJ(2002)A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6 182-197
[7]  
Chowdhury S(1998)A parametric optimization approach for multiobjective engineering problems involving discrete decisions Comput Chem Eng 2 S951—S954-694
[8]  
Tong W(2012)Bi-objective supply chain problem using MOPSO and NSGA-II Int J Ind Eng Comput 3 681-101
[9]  
Messac A(2013)A comprehensive survey: Applications of multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) algorithm Trans Comb 2 39-158
[10]  
Zhang J(1996)Physical programming: Effective optimization for computational design AIAA J 34 149-747