Evidence for implementation of interventions to promote mental health in the workplace: a systematic scoping review protocol

被引：0
作者：
Charlotte Paterson
Caleb Leduc
Margaret Maxwell
Birgit Aust
Benedikt L. Amann
Arlinda Cerga-Pashoja
Evelien Coppens
Chrisje Couwenbergh
Cliodhna O’Connor
Ella Arensman
Birgit A. Greiner
机构：
[1] University of Stirling,NMAHP
[2] University College Cork,RU
[3] National Suicide Research Foundation,School of Public Health
[4] National Research Centre for the Working Environment,Centre for Health Research and Consultancy
[5] Centro Forum Research Unit,Australian Institute for Research
[6] Institut de Neuropsiquiatria i Addicions (INAD),undefined
[7] Parc de Salut Mar,undefined
[8] Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM),undefined
[9] Autonomous University Barcelona,undefined
[10] CIBERSAM,undefined
[11] London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine,undefined
[12] Katholieke Universiteit Leuven,undefined
[13] Kenniscentrum Phrenos,undefined
[14] Griffith University,undefined
[15] International Association for Suicide Prevention (IASP),undefined
来源：
Systematic Reviews | / 10卷
关键词：
Barriers and facilitators; RE-AIM; Workplace; Mental health promotion; Implementation science; Scoping review; Organisational interventions; Workplace interventions; Process evaluation; Wellbeing promotion;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] Milner A(2013)Social-environmental factors and suicide mortality: a narrative review of over 200 articles Sociol Mind 03 137-148
  • [2] Hjelmeland H(2017)Male suicide among construction workers in Australia: a qualitative analysis of the major stressors precipitating death BMC Public Health 17 584-617
  • [3] Arensman E(2008)Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 337 a1655-32
  • [4] De LD(2013)Opening the black box: presenting a model for evaluating organizational-level interventions Eur J Work Organ Psychol 22 601-7
  • [5] Milner A(2005)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework Int J Soc Res Methodol 8 19-11
  • [6] Maheen H(2018)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach BMC Med Res Methodol 18 1-10
  • [7] Currier D(2012)Barriers to the uptake of evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a systematic review of decision makers’ perceptions BMJ Open 2 e001220-46
  • [8] LaMontagne AD(2015)User involvement in a Cochrane systematic review: using structured methods to enhance the clinical relevance, usefulness and usability of a systematic review update Syst Rev 4 1-429
  • [9] Craig P(2019)Systematic review of the use of process evaluations in knowledge translation research Syst Rev 8 1-undefined
  • [10] Dieppe P(2016)PRESS peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 guideline strategies: 2015 guideline statement JClin Epidemool 75 40-undefined
123456