Antifungal Activity of Essential Oils Against Candida Species Isolated from Clinical Samples

被引:0
作者
S. Córdoba
W. Vivot
W. Szusz
G. Albo
机构
[1] INEI ANLIS “Dr. Carlos G. Malbrán”,Departamento Micología
[2] Universidad Nacional de La Plata,Cátedra Micología Médica e Industrial
[3] Universidad Nacional de La Plata,Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales
来源
Mycopathologia | 2019年 / 184卷
关键词
Essential oils; spp.;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We evaluated the in vitro antifungal activity of essential oils obtained from the aromatic plants Laurus nobilis, Thymus vulgaris, Mentha piperita, Cymbopogon citratus and Lippia junelliana against the following Candida species isolated from clinical samples: C. krusei (n = 10); C. albicans (n = 50); C. glabrata (n = 70) and C. parapsilosis (n = 80). The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined according to EDef 7.3.1 document from EUCAST. Amphotericin B and fluconazole were the antifungal drugs used as inhibition control. The concentration ranges evaluated were 0.4–800 and 0.03–128 mg l−1 for essential oils and antifungal drugs, respectively. MIC50 and MIC90, mode and ranges were calculated. All the Candida spp. evaluated were susceptible to amphotericin B (MIC ≤ 1 mg l−1), while fluconazole was inactive for C. krusei (MIC ≥ 32 mg l−1) and intermediate for C. glabrata (MIC≤ 32 mg l−1). The essential oils showed antifungal activity on Candida spp. tested with MIC90 values ranging from 0.8 to 800 mg l−1. In general, the most active essential oils were L. nobilis and T. vulgaris (MIC90 0.8–0.16 mg l−1), and the least active was C. officinalis (MIC90 400–800 mg l−1). C. krusei was inhibited by 5/6 of the essential oils evaluated, and C. glabrata was the least susceptible one. This in vitro study confirms the antifungal activity of these six essential oils assayed which could be a potential source of new molecules useful to control fungal infections caused by some Candida species, including those resistant to antifungal drugs.
引用
收藏
页码:615 / 623
页数:8
相关论文
共 160 条
[1]  
Barchiesi F(2017)Candidemia in the elderly: what does it change? PLoS One 12 e0176576-1361
[2]  
Orsetti E(2012)Changes in incidence and antifungal drug resistance in candidemia: results from population-based laboratory surveillance in Atlanta and Baltimore, 2008–2011 Clin Infect Dis 55 1352-3442
[3]  
Mazzanti S(2013)Epidemiology of candidemia in Latin America: a laboratory-based survey PLoS One 8 e59373-e50
[4]  
Trave F(2017)Clinical and microbiological characteristics and impact of therapeutic strategies on the outcomes of children with candidemia Sci Rep. 7 1083-1221
[5]  
Salvi A(2012)Species identification and antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida bloodstream isolates from population-based surveillance studies in two U.S. cities from 2008 to 2011 J Clin Microbiol 50 3435-e392
[6]  
Nitti C(2016)Clinical practice guideline for the management of candidiasis: 2016 update by the infectious diseases society of America Clin Infect Dis. 62 e1-S435
[7]  
Cleveland AA(2013)Safety of fluconazole in paediatrics: a systematic review Eur J Clin Pharmacol 69 1211-438
[8]  
Farley MM(2017)The global problem of antifungal resistance: prevalence, mechanisms, and management Lancet Infect Dis. 17 e383-201
[9]  
Harrison LH(2017)Antifungal resistance: an emerging reality and a global challenge J Infect Dis. 216 S431-249
[10]  
Stein B(2017)Antimicrobial activity of basil, oregano, and thyme essential oils J Microbiol Biotechnol. 27 429-60