Autonomous vehicles’ object detection architectures ranking based on multi-criteria decision-making techniques

被引:1
|
作者
Babaei P. [1 ]
Riahinia N. [1 ]
Ebadati E O.M. [2 ]
Azimi A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Faculty of Psychology and Education, Kharazmi University, Tehran
[2] Department of Information Technology Management, Kharazmi University, No. 43. South Mofatteh Ave., Tehran
关键词
Autonomous vehicles; Copras technique; Multi-criteria decision-making; Object detection; Vikor technique;
D O I
10.1007/s41870-023-01517-y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Autonomous vehicles rely on object detection for safety, and various algorithms have been developed to improve speed and precision. This paper ranks 44 object detection algorithms published between 2019–2022 using COPRAS and VIKOR ranking techniques. 24 algorithms were built using LiDAR point clouds, with Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) being the foundation. Second + MD3D, CenterPoint + MD3D, and 3D Point Cloud Object Detection Algorithm are the top three algorithms for 3D object detection using Copra’s methodologies. FlexiNet, YOLOv2-5D, and CSA-SS are the best 2D object detection algorithms. These methods are suitable for autonomous driving systems, as accuracy and speed are essential requirements. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Bharati Vidyapeeth's Institute of Computer Applications and Management 2023.
引用
收藏
页码:2343 / 2352
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ranking based on optimal points multi-criteria decision-making method
    Zakeri, Shervin
    GREY SYSTEMS-THEORY AND APPLICATION, 2019, 9 (01) : 45 - 69
  • [2] Hybrid feature ranking and classifier aggregation based on multi-criteria decision-making
    Wang, Xuetao
    He, Qiang
    Jian, Wanwei
    Meng, Haoyu
    Zhang, Bailin
    Jin, Huaizhi
    Yang, Geng
    Zhu, Lin
    Wang, Linjing
    Zhen, Xin
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2024, 238
  • [3] New Multi-criteria Decision-Making Based on Fuzzy Similarity, Distance and Ranking
    El Alaoui, M.
    Ben-Azza, H.
    Zahi, A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRD INTERNATIONAL AFRO-EUROPEAN CONFERENCE FOR INDUSTRIAL ADVANCEMENT-AECIA 2016, 2018, 565 : 138 - 148
  • [4] MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING (MCDM) TECHNIQUES IN PLANNING
    MASSAM, BH
    PROGRESS IN PLANNING, 1988, 30 : 1 - &
  • [5] A comparison of two multi-criteria decision-making techniques
    Akhavi, F
    Hayes, C
    2003 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-5, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 956 - 961
  • [6] Multi-criteria decision-making techniques for asset selection
    Harode S.
    Jha M.
    Srivastava N.
    Recent Advances in Computer Science and Communications, 2021, 14 (06) : 1937 - 1954
  • [7] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Encheva, Sylvia
    MICBE '09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS, 2009, : 192 - +
  • [8] Barriers to the sustainable adoption of autonomous vehicles in developing countries: A multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Shahedi, Alireza
    Dadashpour, Iman
    Rezaei, Mahdi
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (05)
  • [9] Ranking the sawability of ornamental stone using Fuzzy Delphi and multi-criteria decision-making techniques
    Mikaeil, Reza
    Ozcelik, Yilmaz
    Yousefi, Reza
    Ataei, Mohammad
    Hosseini, Seyed Mehdi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 2013, 58 : 118 - 126
  • [10] An Alternative Ranking Approach and Its Usage in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Industrial Engineering Department, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Maçka, Besiktas
    34367, Turkey
    不详
    34357, Turkey
    Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst., 2009, 3 (219-235): : 219 - 235