Spanish Validation of the Flourishing Scale in the General Population

被引:0
作者
Irene Checa
Jaime Perales
Begoña Espejo
机构
[1] Universitat de València,Departamento de Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento
[2] University of Kansas Medical Center,Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
来源
Current Psychology | 2018年 / 37卷
关键词
Adaptation; Validation; Confirmatory factor analysis; Psychometric properties; Instrumental studies; Flourishing;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Well-being research and its measurement have grown in the last two decades. The objective of this study was to adapt and validate the Flourishing Scale in a sample of Spanish adults. This was a cross-sectional study using a non-probabilistic sample of 999 Spanish general adult population participants. The psychometric properties of the scale were analysed from an exploratory and confirmatory perspective. Exploratory factor analysis showed a one-factor solution explaining 42.3% of the variance; an internal consistency of .846; temporal reliability correlation of .749; convergent validity with the Satisfaction with Life Scale of .521 and criterion validity with positive and negative affect (PANAS), pessimism and optimism (LOT-R) ranging from .270 to .488. Confirmatory factor analysis testing the one-factor solution showed a χ2 of 65.57 df = 20; CFI of .982, RMSEA of .06, average variance extracted index of .518 and composite reliability index of .841. Results showed that the Spanish version of the FS is a reliable and valid method for measuring high levels of well-being.
引用
收藏
页码:949 / 956
页数:7
相关论文
共 160 条
  • [1] Anderson James C.(1988)Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach Psychological Bulletin 103 411-423
  • [2] Gerbing David W.(2012)The European year for active ageing and solidarity between generations 2012 Kniznica 13 6-9
  • [3] Antolikova E(2016)Cross Cultural Adaptation & Psychometric Validation of research instruments: A methodological review Journal of Behavioral Health 5 129-136
  • [4] Arafat SY(2003)Satisfaction with life scale: Analysis of factorial invariance across sexes Personality and Individual Differences 35 1255-1260
  • [5] Chowdhury HR(1987)The Sensitivity of Confirmatory Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis to Violations of Measurement Scale and Distributional Assumptions Journal of Marketing Research 24 222-935
  • [6] Qusar MS(2014)Evaluation of affect in mexico and spain: Psychometric properties and usefulness of an abbreviated version of the day reconstruction method Journal of Happiness Studies 15 915-105
  • [7] Hafez MA(1959)Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix Psychological Bulletin 56 81-396
  • [8] Atienza FL(1983)A global measure of perceived stress Journal of Health and Social Behavior 24 385-478
  • [9] Balaguer I(2014)Middle response scale options are inappropriate for ideal point scales Journal of Business and Psychology 29 463-15
  • [10] Garcı́a-Merita ML(1974)The Hopkins symptom checklist (HSCL): A self report symptom inventory Behavioral Science 19 1-75