RETRACTED ARTICLE: Screening and differential physiological responses of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) to drought stress

被引:0
作者
Rowland M. Kamanga
机构
[1] Hiroshima University,Graduate School of Biosphere Science
来源
Plant Physiology Reports | 2020年 / 25卷
关键词
Tomato; Drought stress; Photosynthesis; Carboxylation efficiency; Stomatal limitation; Osmotic adjustment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Water deficit stress remains an important agricultural threat worldwide, thereby identifying germplasm with proven tolerance to drought stress is imperative. Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) is a prominent fruit vegetable whose growth is considerably hampered by drought stress. This study evaluated physiological responses of 14 commercial tomato cultivars subjected to drought stress. Multivariate analysis and drought susceptibility index were employed to assess differential drought tolerance among cultivars, resulting into selection of Star 9003 and Rodede as tolerant and sensitive cultivars respectively. Subsequent physiological experiments showed that cultivar Star 9003 maintained better photosynthetic parameters as opposed to Rodede under drought stress, but had lower intercellular carbon dioxide concentration indicating that available CO2 was efficiently assimilated as also shown by its higher carboxylation and instantaneous transpiration efficiencies (CE and ITE). Lower stomatal limitation values in sensitive cultivar Rodede hint at a possibility that the major photosynthetic limiting factors were non-stomatal such as oxidative stress-induced photoinhibitory damage. The present study reports that tolerance in Star 9003 was unrelated to avoidance in stomatal water losses, but in part through development of morphologically thicker leaves, accumulation of organic osmolytes for osmotic adjustment and attainment of higher efficiencies in photosynthetic water use and carbon assimilation.
引用
收藏
页码:472 / 482
页数:10
相关论文
共 175 条
[1]  
Alarcon JJ(1993)Water relations and osmotic adjustment in Physiologia Plantarum 89 441-447
[2]  
Sanchez-Blanco MJ(2017) and Environmental and Experimental Botany 135 1-12
[3]  
Bolarin MC(2005) during short-term salt exposure and recovery Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 24 23-58
[4]  
Torrecillas A(1982)Unravelling the strategies used by the wild tomato species Photosynthesis 2 263-343
[5]  
Albaladejo I(2005) to confront salt stress: From leaf anatomical adaptations to molecular responses Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56 1159-10
[6]  
Meco V(2017)Drought and salt tolerance in plants Plant, Cell and Environment 40 4-16
[7]  
Plasencia F(1991)Environmental regulation of photosynthesis Journal of Experimental Botany 42 1-894
[8]  
Flores FB(2002)Drought resistance, water-use efficiency, and yield potential—Are they compatible, dissonant, or mutually exclusive? Annals of Botany 89 887-14
[9]  
Bolarin MC(2018)Osmotic adjustment is a prime drought stress adaptive engine in support of plant production Scientific Reports 8 1-637
[10]  
Egea I(2006)Effects of water deficits on carbon assimilation Journal of Plant Physiology 163 629-759