Model Assessment of Cattle and Climate Impacts on Stream Fecal Coliform Pollution in the Salmon River Watershed, British Columbia, Canada

被引:0
作者
Zhanxue Zhu
Klaas Broersma
Asit Mazumder
机构
[1] University of Victoria,Water and Aquatic Sciences Research Program, Department of Biology
[2] Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada,Kamloops Range Research Station
来源
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution | 2011年 / 215卷
关键词
Fecal coliform; Water quality; Model; Cattle farming; Climate;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A bacterial water quality model (BWQM) was developed and used to evaluate the impacts of cattle farming and climate change on the stream fecal coliform pollution in the Salmon River watershed in south-central British Columbia, Canada. The accuracy of the model simulation was evaluated using the Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient of efficiency (COE). The BWQM simulated the observed field data well, with the values of the COE ranging from 0.76 to 0.78 for the stream flow, from 0.55 to 0.60 for the fecal coliform (FC) concentration, and from 0.85 to 0.89 for the FC loading. The BWQM captured more than 79%, 66%, and 90% variation of the daily stream flow, FC concentration, and FC loading, respectively. The BWQM predicts that between 70% and 80% of the FC were transferred from the cattle farm to the Salmon River through the snowmelt-caused surface runoff during late winter and early spring, with the balance 20% to 30% coming from the soil-lateral flow and the groundwater return flow. The model also indicates that the stream FC concentration is sensitive to the distance of the cattle farm to the Salmon River. The model scenario analysis reveals that the climate change, at an assumed 1°C increment of daily air temperature, results in an increase in the stream FC concentration in the spring, fall, and winter, but there is also a decrease in the summer. The increased air temperature also changes the seasonal pattern of the stream FC concentration. Rainfall can reduce the stream FC concentration and mitigate the impact of the increased air temperature on the stream FC concentration as long as it does not result in a surface runoff or flooding event.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 176
页数:21
相关论文
共 140 条
[31]  
Edge T(2004)Survival of Journal of Hydrology 285 272-285
[32]  
Kent RA(1995) in beef cattle fecal pats under different levels of solar exposure Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 82 363-374
[33]  
Maarouf AR(1975)Spatial and annual variability in concentrations and sources of Bacteriological Reviews 39 144-167
[34]  
Wilson J(2002) in multiple watersheds Bioresource Technology 82 261-271
[35]  
Collins R(2008)Multidecadal hydrological response of a Sierra Nevada watershed: Sensitivity to weathering rate and change in deposition American Journal of Preventive Medicine 35 451-458
[36]  
Rutherford K(2008)The Nashwaak experimental watershed project: Analyzing effects of clearcutting on soil temperature, soil moisture, snowpack, snowmelt and stream flow Ecological Modelling 213 331-344
[37]  
Cossarini G(2000)Psychrophilic bacteria Journal of Range Management 53 506-510
[38]  
Solidoro C(2006)Chloride, sodium, potassium and fecal bacteria levels in surface runoff and subsurface percolates from grassland plots amended with cattle slurry Journal of Environmental Quality 35 795-805
[39]  
Entry JA(1995)Climate change and waterborne disease rish in the Great Lake Region of the U.S Water Research 29 847-855
[40]  
Hubbard RK(undefined)Bayesian calibration of a model describing carbon, water, and heat fluxes for a Swedish boreal forest stand undefined undefined undefined-undefined