Validation of an oligo-gene signature for the prognostic stratification of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)

被引:0
作者
Joseph Geradts
Jeffrey Groth
Yuan Wu
Genglin Jin
机构
[1] Duke University Medical Center,Department of Pathology
[2] Duke University Medical Center,Department of Biostatistics
[3] Brigham and Women’s Hospital,Department of Pathology
来源
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | 2016年 / 157卷
关键词
DCIS; Biomarkers; Invasion; Early breast cancer progression;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Current evidence suggests that the majority of DCIS lesions do not progress to invasive carcinoma, and overtreatment of DCIS is a significant problem. We previously reported an 8-gene signature that differentiated microdissected low-grade (LG) DCIS lesions with and without associated stromal invasion, based on differential DNA copy number changes detected by quantitative (q) PCR. The current study was undertaken to validate our candidate breast cancer invasion gene panel in a larger series of non-microdissected LG DCIS cases, and to investigate its potential utility in intermediate-grade (IG) and high-grade (HG) DCIS. Representative paraffin blocks were selected from 267 resected DCIS cases with 5–15 years of follow-up (139 pure DCIS [“PD”] and 128 mixed DCIS with associated invasion [“MD”]). These included 171 LG, 46 IG and 50 HG DCIS cases. Gene copy number changes were determined by qPCR, and their differential distribution in the PD and MD subgroups was evaluated. As an alternate platform, we employed immunohistochemistry (IHC). Novel IHC assays were developed for all eight candidate genes, and increased or reduced protein expression was manually scored. Separate multi-gene models were developed for qPCR and IHC to distinguish progressing and non-progressing DCIS lesions. By qPCR analysis, a panel of six genes, as well as CELSR1 alone (a potential invasion suppressor), differentiated PD and MD cases in LG and IG, but not in HG DCIS. By IHC, a panel of three genes, as well as GRAP2 alone (a potential invasion promoter), also distinguished PD and MD cases in LG and IG, but not in HG DCIS. The combination of CELSR1 (by qPCR) and GRAP2 (by IHC) had the best discriminatory power (p = 0.00004). Assays testing either or both of these genes have the potential to become important adjuncts for choosing appropriate treatment for LG/IG DCIS patients.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 459
页数:12
相关论文
共 221 条
  • [1] Page DL(1982)Intraductal carcinoma of the breast: follow-up after biopsy only Cancer 49 751-758
  • [2] Dupont WD(1994)Long-term follow-up of in situ carcinoma of the breast Semin Diagn Pathol 11 223-235
  • [3] Rogers LW(1998)Prediction of local recurrence of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast using five histological classifications: a comparative study with long follow-up Hum Pathol 29 915-923
  • [4] Landenberger M(1993)Noninvasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: the relevance of histologic categorization Hum Pathol 24 16-23
  • [5] Eusebi V(2015)Continued observation of the natural history of low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ reaffirms proclivity for local recurrence even after more than 30 years of follow-up Mod Pathol 28 662-669
  • [6] Feudale E(1984)Precancerous and cancerous breast lesions during lifetime and at autopsy. A study of 83 women Cancer 54 612-615
  • [7] Foschini MP(2012)Differential copy number aberrations in novel candidate genes associated with progression from in situ to invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast Genes Chromosomes Cancer 51 1067-1078
  • [8] Micheli A(1996)A prognostic index for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast Cancer 77 2267-2274
  • [9] Conti A(2015)Non-genomic effects of the NR4A1/Nur77/TR3/NGFIB orphan nuclear receptor Steroids 95 1-6
  • [10] Riva C(2015)The interplay of NR4A receptors and the oncogene-tumor suppressor networks in cancer Cell Signal 27 257-266