Effects of different environmental regulations and their heterogeneity on air pollution control in China

被引:0
作者
Xueping Wu
Ming Gao
机构
[1] Fujian Jiangxia University,School of Economics and Trade
[2] Fuzhou University,School of Economics and Management
来源
Journal of Regulatory Economics | 2021年 / 60卷
关键词
Environmental regulation; Air pollution control; China; Panel threshold model; H23; O13; Q53; Q58;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study endeavors to explore the impact of different environmental regulations and their heterogeneity on air pollution control in China. By employing a slacks-based measure of directional distance function model, considering undesirable outputs, the efficiency of air pollution control of China’s 30 provinces during 2001–2014 is evaluated. The estimates indicate that the efficiency of air pollution control is fluctuating, and there is obvious regional differences. By using provincial-level panel data and panel threshold models, empirical results show that: (1) There is a nonlinear relationship between environmental regulation and air pollution control efficiency, and it can be positively correlated, but it is constrained by the stringency of regulation: there is a single threshold for formal (command-and-control (CAC) and market-based) regulation, while there is a double threshold for informal regulation. (2) Different environmental regulations have different governance effects. Compared with CAC regulation, market regulation can attract more attention of enterprises. (3) It may be ineffective to expect informal regulation to improve the air pollution control efficiency. Therefore, in order to achieve real sustainable development, the government should set up reasonable regulation stringency and optimize the combination of regulation tools.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 166
页数:26
相关论文
共 202 条
[1]  
Arguedas C(2015)Emission standards and monitoring strategies in a hierarchical setting Environmental and Resource Economics 60 1-24
[2]  
Rousseau S(2017)EU air pollution regulation: A breath of fresh air for Eastern European polluting industries? J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 83 145-163
[3]  
Bagayev I(2019)An empirical evaluation about the effects of environmental expenditures on environmental quality in coordinated market economies Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26 108-118
[4]  
Lochard J(2000)Effects of air quality regulations on polluting industries Journal of Political Economy 108 379-421
[5]  
Basoglu A(2015)A game-theoretic approach to optimizing the scale of electricity storing systems in a regional electrical grid Energy System 6 389-415
[6]  
Uzar U(2001)U.S. sulfur dioxide emissions trading program: Results and further applications Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 130 241-246
[7]  
Becker R(2001)NGO influence in international environmental negotiations: A framework for analysis Global Environmental Politics 1 65-85
[8]  
Henderson V(2010)Clean technological change in developing-country industrial clusters: Mexican leather tanning Environmental Economics and Policy Studies 12 115-132
[9]  
Belenky AS(2010)Environmental organisations and the Europeanisation of public policy in Central and Eastern Europe: The case of biodiversity governance Environmental Politics 19 708-735
[10]  
Benkovic SR(2016)Impact of sustainable environmental expenditures policy on air pollution reduction, during European integration framework The Amfiteatru Economic Journal 18 286-302