Flood potential mapping by integrating the bivariate statistics, multi-criteria decision-making, and machine learning techniques

被引:0
作者
Ehsan Shahiri Tabarestani
Sanaz Hadian
Quoc Bao Pham
Sk Ajim Ali
Dung Tri Phung
机构
[1] Iran University of Science and Technology,Department of Civil Engineering
[2] Thu Dau Mot University,Institute of Applied Technology
[3] Aligarh Muslim University (AMU),Department of Geography, Faculty of Science
[4] The University of Queensland,School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine
来源
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment | 2023年 / 37卷
关键词
COCOSO method; Flood susceptibility mapping; MABAC method; Multi-criteria decision-making; Multilayer perceptron;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This research aims to determine the flood potential mapping within Golestan Province in Iran, applying six novel ensemble techniques guided by the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM), bivariate statistics, and artificial neural network methods. The combinations of Combined Compromise Solution (COCOSO), Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison (MABAC), and multilayer perceptron (MLP) with Frequency Ratio (FR), and Weights of Evidence (WOE) were then generated. It is noted that this is the first application of COCOSO method in flood susceptibility assessment and its efficiency had not been evaluated before. In this regard, 10 flood influential criteria namely altitude, slope, aspect, plan curvature, distance from rivers, Topographic Wetness Index (TWI), rainfall, soil type, geology, and land use, 240 flood points, and 240 non-flood points were employed for the modeling process, of which 70% of such data were chosen for training and remaining 30% for validating. The accuracy of proposed methods was tested by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve. MABAC-WOE obtained the largest predictive precision (0.937), followed by MLP-WOE (0.934), COCOSO-WOE (0.923), MABAC-FR (0.921), MLP-FR (0.919), and COCOSO-FR (0.892), respectively. The high accuracy of all proposed models represents their capability in flood susceptibility assessment and can guide future flood risk management in the study location.
引用
收藏
页码:1415 / 1430
页数:15
相关论文
共 266 条
  • [1] Ahmadlou M(2019)Flood susceptibility assessment using integration of adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and biogeography-based optimization (BBO) and BAT algorithms (BA) Geocarto Int 34 1252-1272
  • [2] Karimi M(2021)Flood hazards susceptibility mapping using statistical, fuzzy logic, and MCDM methods Soft Computing 25 9325-9346
  • [3] Alizadeh S(2021)Spatial modeling of snow avalanche susceptibility using hybrid and ensemble machine learning techniques CATENA 206 105524-1321
  • [4] Shirzadi A(2020)GIS-based comparative assessment of flood susceptibility mapping using hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach, Naïve Bayes tree, bivariate statistics and logistic regression: a case of Topľa basin Slovakia Ecol Indic 117 106620-1592
  • [5] Parvinnejhad D(2012)Flood hazard and damage assessment in the Ebro Delta (NW Mediterranean) to relative sea level rise Nat Hazards 62 1301-1033
  • [6] Shahabi H(1988)Integration of geological datasets for gold exploration in Nova Scotia Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 54 1585-1018
  • [7] Panahi M(2016)Multi-criteria decision-making for flood risk management: a survey of the current state of the art Nat Hazard 16 1019-1402
  • [8] Akay H(2018)Performance evaluation of the GIS-based data mining techniques of best-first decision tree, random forest, and naïve Bayes tree for landslide susceptibility modeling Sci Total Environ 644 1006-98
  • [9] Akay H(2019)Flash-flood potential index mapping using weights of evidence, decision trees models and their novel hybrid integration Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 33 1375-2142
  • [10] Ali SA(2020)Identification of areas prone to flash-flood phenomena using multiple-criteria decision-making, bivariate statistics, machine learning and their ensembles Sci Total Environ 712 136492-68