Measurement uncertainty: requirements set in the accreditation standards

被引:0
|
作者
Kyriacos C. Tsimillis
机构
[1] Pancyprian Union of Chemists,Division of Quality Assurance
来源
Accreditation and Quality Assurance | 2018年 / 23卷
关键词
Measurement uncertainty; Accreditation; Proficiency testing; Reference material; Metrological traceability; Conformity assessment body;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Measurement uncertainty is of high importance to all testing and calibration laboratories and those involved in sampling activities. Its evaluation requires good understanding of the method implemented and realisation of all factors contributing to it. It is required that the users of the results fully understand the meaning of uncertainty stated on test reports and calibration certificates and, when needed, ask for clarifications. Laboratories, both the accredited ones and those being prepared towards their accreditation, need to take this into account when evaluating the uncertainty of their results. Competent authorities need to consider the stated uncertainty to compare the result with a legislative limit. The producer can decide on adjustments needed. The consumer may find it more difficult to understand how this “uncertain component” of the results could affect their health, safety or economic rights. This article describes the relevant requirements of the accreditation standards referring both to testing and calibration laboratories and to proficiency testing and reference material producers. Further to this, the article explains why all these factors have to be considered by a laboratory.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 114
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Corporate governance and the responsiveness of organisations to a change in accreditation standards
    Previtali, Pietro
    Cerchiello, Paola
    QUALITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2021, 27 (01) : 123 - 133
  • [42] Hospital Infection Control accreditation standards: A Comparative Review
    Mosadeghrad, Ali Mohammad
    Qazanfari, Fatemeh
    Keykhani, Sima
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND SAFETY AT WORK, 2022, 12 (01) : 99 - 122
  • [43] Developing hospital accreditation standards: Applying fuzzy DEMATEL
    Ghadami, Ladan
    Asl, Iravan Masoudi
    Hessam, Somayeh
    Modiri, Mahmoud
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, 2021, 14 (03) : 847 - 855
  • [44] Quality regulations and accreditation standards for clinical chemistry in Turkey
    Uras, Fikriye
    CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2009, 42 (4-5) : 263 - 265
  • [45] Understanding accreditation standards in general practice – a qualitative study
    Tina Drud Due
    Thorkil Thorsen
    Marius Brostrøm Kousgaard
    BMC Family Practice, 20
  • [46] Clinicians’ perspectives on quality: do they match accreditation standards?
    Nesibe Akdemir
    Romana Malik
    Theanne Walters
    Stanley Hamstra
    Fedde Scheele
    Human Resources for Health, 19
  • [47] Understanding accreditation standards in general practice - a qualitative study
    Due, Tina Drud
    Thorsen, Thorkil
    Kousgaard, Marius Brostrom
    BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2019, 20 (1)
  • [48] Scientific underpinnings and background to standards and accreditation in digital forensics
    Beckett, Jason
    Slay, Jill
    DIGITAL INVESTIGATION, 2011, 8 (02) : 114 - 121
  • [49] Accreditation of Hospitals: Does it Follow Quality Standards Itself?
    Hansis, M.
    Zirker, T.
    GESUNDHEITSOEKONOMIE UND QUALITAETSMANAGEMENT, 2014, 19 (06): : 286 - 289
  • [50] Compliance of Interventional Radiologists With Interventional Oncology Accreditation Standards
    Dokdok, Murat
    Balli, Huseyin Tugsan
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (07)