Measurement uncertainty: requirements set in the accreditation standards

被引:0
|
作者
Kyriacos C. Tsimillis
机构
[1] Pancyprian Union of Chemists,Division of Quality Assurance
来源
Accreditation and Quality Assurance | 2018年 / 23卷
关键词
Measurement uncertainty; Accreditation; Proficiency testing; Reference material; Metrological traceability; Conformity assessment body;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Measurement uncertainty is of high importance to all testing and calibration laboratories and those involved in sampling activities. Its evaluation requires good understanding of the method implemented and realisation of all factors contributing to it. It is required that the users of the results fully understand the meaning of uncertainty stated on test reports and calibration certificates and, when needed, ask for clarifications. Laboratories, both the accredited ones and those being prepared towards their accreditation, need to take this into account when evaluating the uncertainty of their results. Competent authorities need to consider the stated uncertainty to compare the result with a legislative limit. The producer can decide on adjustments needed. The consumer may find it more difficult to understand how this “uncertain component” of the results could affect their health, safety or economic rights. This article describes the relevant requirements of the accreditation standards referring both to testing and calibration laboratories and to proficiency testing and reference material producers. Further to this, the article explains why all these factors have to be considered by a laboratory.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 114
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Numerical simulation for determining the measurement uncertainty for the calibration of mass standards by transfer artefacts
    Lehrmann K.
    Härtig F.
    Tutsch R.
    Measurement: Sensors, 2022, 24
  • [32] Numerical simulation for the determination of the measurement uncertainty for the calibration of mass standards by transfer artefacts
    Lehrmann, Katharina
    Haertig, Frank
    Tutsch, Rainer
    TM-TECHNISCHES MESSEN, 2021, 88 (02) : 90 - 102
  • [33] Requirements, Challenges and Consequences in Accreditation of Engineering Programmes
    Uziak, Jacek
    Oladiran, M. Tunde
    Walczak, Magdalena
    Vergara, Julio
    Munoz Ilabaca, Mabel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2017, 33 (01) : 187 - 202
  • [34] Measurement uncertainty of current harmonics during the assessment of compliance to grid code requirements
    Marais, Zander
    Rens, Johan
    Peterson, Brandon
    Botha, Gerhard
    2018 IEEE 9TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON APPLIED MEASUREMENTS FOR POWER SYSTEMS (AMPS), 2018, : 134 - 139
  • [35] Mobile phones control set dimensional chain calculation involving measurement uncertainty
    Raba, K.
    Kulderknup, E.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF DAAAM BALTIC INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, PTS 1 AND 2, 2008, : 129 - +
  • [36] A Library Compliance Strategy for Regional Accreditation Standards: Using ACRL Higher Education Standards with NEASC Standards
    Nelson, William Neal
    Smith, Diane
    Thistle, Dawn R.
    COLLEGE & UNDERGRADUATE LIBRARIES, 2012, 19 (01) : 46 - 79
  • [37] Interprofessional education accreditation standards in the USA: A comparative analysis
    Zorek, Joseph
    Raehl, Cynthia
    JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2013, 27 (02) : 123 - 130
  • [38] Clinicians' perspectives on quality: do they match accreditation standards?
    Akdemir, Nesibe
    Malik, Romana
    Walters, Theanne
    Hamstra, Stanley
    Scheele, Fedde
    HUMAN RESOURCES FOR HEALTH, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [39] The Current Accreditation Standards and Future Needs in Medical Education
    Shirzadeh, Ebrahim
    Shomoossi, Nematullah
    Tajabadi, Ali
    GALEN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 9
  • [40] Designing Accreditation Standards for Limited Surgery Facilities in Iran
    Asgari, Nader
    Hessam, Somayeh
    Asl, Iravan Masoudi
    Vahdat, Shaghayegh
    HEALTH SCOPE, 2020, 9 (03):