Measurement uncertainty: requirements set in the accreditation standards

被引:0
|
作者
Kyriacos C. Tsimillis
机构
[1] Pancyprian Union of Chemists,Division of Quality Assurance
来源
Accreditation and Quality Assurance | 2018年 / 23卷
关键词
Measurement uncertainty; Accreditation; Proficiency testing; Reference material; Metrological traceability; Conformity assessment body;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Measurement uncertainty is of high importance to all testing and calibration laboratories and those involved in sampling activities. Its evaluation requires good understanding of the method implemented and realisation of all factors contributing to it. It is required that the users of the results fully understand the meaning of uncertainty stated on test reports and calibration certificates and, when needed, ask for clarifications. Laboratories, both the accredited ones and those being prepared towards their accreditation, need to take this into account when evaluating the uncertainty of their results. Competent authorities need to consider the stated uncertainty to compare the result with a legislative limit. The producer can decide on adjustments needed. The consumer may find it more difficult to understand how this “uncertain component” of the results could affect their health, safety or economic rights. This article describes the relevant requirements of the accreditation standards referring both to testing and calibration laboratories and to proficiency testing and reference material producers. Further to this, the article explains why all these factors have to be considered by a laboratory.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 114
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Information on measurement uncertainty in test and product standards
    Hinrichs, W
    ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2003, 8 (12) : 569 - 575
  • [12] Measurement uncertainty: Opinions of the Government, the Accreditation Council and the Candidate accredited laboratory
    R. G. Visser
    Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 2002, 7 (3) : 124 - 125
  • [13] Fabrication and Measurement Uncertainty Evaluation for Polystyrene Nanoparticle Standards
    Chen, Chao-Jung
    Lin, Chih-Min
    Yu, Ta-Chang
    Weng, Han-Fu
    Chen, Hui
    Liu, Yi-Yu
    JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS, 2010, 31 (06): : 511 - 516
  • [14] Perceptions on the Implementation of Accreditation Requirements and Standards in the Primary Healthcare Centres, Ras Al Khaimah, UAE
    Al Seraidi, Salhah Taresh Ahmed Ali
    Adam, Shukri
    Shivappa, Pooja
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH MANAGEMENT, 2021, 23 (03) : 368 - 379
  • [15] Minimum requirements for the estimation of measurement uncertainty: Recommendations of the joint Working group for uncertainty of measurement of the CSMBLM and CCMB
    Celap, Ivana
    Vukasovic, Ines
    Juricic, Gordana
    Simundic, Ana-Maria
    BIOCHEMIA MEDICA, 2017, 27 (03) : 467 - 476
  • [16] EAE laboratory standards and accreditation
    Nihoyannopoulos, P.
    Fox, Kevin
    Fraser, Alan
    Pinto, Fausto
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, 2007, 8 (01): : 80 - 87
  • [17] Accreditation Requirements for Computer Modeling
    Schlagenhaufer, Franz
    ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY SYMPOSIUM 2009, SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 109 - 111
  • [18] Estimation of uncertainty measurement-A prerequisite of ISO1589 accreditation for clinical laboratories
    Iqbal, Sahar
    Ijaz, Aamir
    Sharafat, Shaheen
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 67 (05) : 701 - 705
  • [19] Developing hospital accreditation standards in Uganda
    Galukande, Moses
    Katamba, Achilles
    Nakasujja, Noeline
    Baingana, Rhona
    Bateganya, Moses
    Hagopian, Amy
    Tavrow, Paula
    Barnhart, Scott
    Luboga, Sam
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 31 (03) : e204 - e218
  • [20] AAALAC international standards and accreditation process
    Gettayacamin M.
    Retnam L.
    Toxicological Research, 2017, 33 (3) : 183 - 189