Comparison of the convolution quadrature method and enhanced inverse FFT with application in elastodynamic boundary element method

Transient problems can often be solved with transformation methods, where the inverse transformation is usually performed numerically. Here, the discrete Fourier transform in combination with the exponential window method is compared with the convolution quadrature method formulated as inverse transformation. Both are inverse Laplace transforms, which are formally identical but use different complex frequencies. A numerical study is performed, first with simple convolution integrals and, second, with a boundary element method (BEM) for elastodynamics. Essentially, when combined with the BEM, the discrete Fourier transform needs less frequency calculations, but finer mesh compared to the convolution quadrature method to obtain the same level of accuracy. If further fast methods like the fast multipole method are used to accelerate the boundary element method the convolution quadrature method is better, because the iterative solver needs much less iterations to converge. This is caused by the larger real part of the complex frequencies necessary for the calculation, which improves the conditions of system matrix.