The ethical obligation of the dead donor rule

被引:0
|
作者
Anne L. Dalle Ave
Daniel P. Sulmasy
James L. Bernat
机构
[1] University Hospital of Lausanne,Ethics Unit
[2] University Medical Center 1,Institute for Biomedical Ethics
[3] Georgetown University,Kennedy Institute of Ethics, The Departments of Medicine and Philosophy and the Pellegrino Center for Clinical Bioethics
[4] Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center,Neurology Department
来源
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy | 2020年 / 23卷
关键词
Transplantation; Ethics; Donation after circulatory determination of death (DCDD); The dead donor rule (DDR);
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The dead donor rule (DDR) originally stated that organ donors must not be killed by and for organ donation. Scholars later added the requirement that vital organs should not be procured before death. Some now argue that the DDR is breached in donation after circulatory determination of death (DCDD) programs. DCDD programs do not breach the original version of the DDR because vital organs are procured only after circulation has ceased permanently as a consequence of withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy. We hold that the original rendition of the DDR banning killing by and for organ donation is the fundamental norm that should be maintained in transplantation ethics. We propose separating the DDR from two other fundamental normative rules: the duties to prevent harm and to obtain informed consent.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 50
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条