Resilience and the industrial food system: analyzing the impacts of agricultural industrialization on food system vulnerability

被引:0
作者
Rotz S. [1 ]
Fraser E.D.G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Geography, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, N1G 2W1, ON
关键词
Adaptive capacity; Agriculture; Climate change; Farming; Industrial food system; Resilience;
D O I
10.1007/s13412-015-0277-1
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this paper is to explore how socioeconomic and technological shifts in Canadian and American food production, processing, and distribution have impacted resilience in the food system. First, we use the social ecological systems literature to define food system resilience as a function of that system’s ability to absorb external shocks while maintaining core functions, such as food production and distribution. We then use the literature to argue that we can infer food system resilience by exploring three key dimensions: (1) the diversity of the food system’s components, (2) the degree to which the components are connected, and (3) the degree of decision-making autonomy within the food system. Next, we discuss the impacts of industrialization on these three factors within Canada and the USA. Specifically, we show how processes of corporate concentration, farm-scale intensification, mechanization, and the “cost-price squeeze” have led to a decrease in ecological and economic diversity, a high degree of spatial and organizational connectivity, and a diminished decision-making capacity for individual farmers. While this analysis is qualitative and heuristic, the evidence reviewed here leads us to postulate that our food system is becoming less resilient to external shocks such as climate change. We conclude by discussing four possible strategies to restore resilience and suggest a more transformational shift in food system politics and practice. Specifically, we argue that publicly led multifunctional policies may support more diversified production while programs to promote food system localization can increase farmer autonomy. However, these shifts will not be possible without social-structural corrections of current power imbalances in the food system. This policy discussion reinforces the value of the social ecological framework and, specifically, its capacity to produce an analysis that interweaves ecology, economy, and power. © 2015, AESS.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 473
页数:14
相关论文
共 72 条
  • [1] Abson D.J., Fraser E.D., Benton T.G., Landscape diversity and the resilience of agricultural returns: a portfolio analysis of land-use patterns and economic returns from lowland agriculture, Agric Food Secur, 2, (2013)
  • [2] Adger W.N., Vulnerability, Glob Environ Chang, 16, pp. 268-281, (2006)
  • [3] Alonso-Fradejas A., Borras S.M., Holmes T., Et al., Food sovereignty: convergence and contradictions, conditions and challenges, Third World Q, 36, pp. 431-448, (2015)
  • [4] Becton L., Update on PEDV research, (2014)
  • [5] Bennett A.J., Bending G.D., Chandler D., Et al., Meeting the demand for crop production: the challenge of yield decline in crops grown in short rotations, Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc, 87, pp. 52-71, (2012)
  • [6] Berardi G., Green R., Hammond B., Stability, sustainability, and catastrophe: applying resilience thinking to U.S. agriculture, Res Hum Ecol, 18, pp. 115-125, (2011)
  • [7] Berkes F., Colding J., Folke C., Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change, (2003)
  • [8] Blackwell B.F., Dolbeer R.A., Decline of the red-winged blackbird population in Ohio correlated to changes in agriculture, J Wildl Manag, 65, pp. 661-667, (2001)
  • [9] Boody G., Vondracek B., Andow D.A., Et al., Multifunctional agriculture in the United States, Bioscience, 55, pp. 27-38, (2005)
  • [10] Born B., Purcell M., Avoiding the local trap: scale and food systems in planning research, J Plan Educ Res, 26, pp. 195-207, (2006)